India probe exposes US$3.6b mining scandal

July 28, 2011

An independent-led inquiry implicated a prominent Indian opposition politician in a $3.6 billion illegal iron ore mining scandal today, underscoring a need to overhaul and better regulate India’s booming but graft-ridden mining sector.

The extensive report into mining graft in southern Karnataka state accused its chief minister, B.S. Yediyurappa, and other key officials of causing at least 160 billion rupees (US$3.6 billion) in lost state revenues between 2006 and 2010 from illegal mining and a litany of abuses.

“This inquiry found that there’s a large scale involvement of officials, powerful people, both in administration as well as in the government,” independent ombudsman Justice Santosh Hegde, who spearheaded the report, told reporters.

Several other senior officials with the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) including the state Tourism Minister Janardhana Reddy, were also named in the report.

“I have not done any mistake. I don’t think I need to worry about anything,” Yediyurappa told reporters. He has rejected calls for his resignation.

Other BJP officials were not immediately available for comment.

While the report is not legally binding the political implications are far reaching and analysts, as well as several members of the BJP, predicted several resignations would follow.

With India’s ruling Congress party coalition reeling from a spate of graft cases including a multi-billion dollar telecoms scandal, the spotlight on the BJP could give the stricken government of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh some respite.

Hegde said 400 firms and 787 people had been implicated in a web of corruption involving mining, transport, customs and shipping officials, leading to hundreds of thousands of tonnes of iron ore going missing from mines across the state.

Illegal mining is a major problem across India, as powerful businessmen, often in cahoots with officials, plunder the country’s mineral wealth to meet surging demand for commodities like iron ore in places such as China.

India is the world’s No. 3 iron ore supplier after Australia and Brazil. Karnataka is India’s second largest iron ore producing state but deep-rooted graft and conflicts led authorities to once even impose an export ban that spiked global iron ore prices.

Lax oversight and patchy laws are prompting parliament to propose a new national mining bill that will open up the sector to foreign investment, create an independent regulator and impose profit sharing arrangements with villagers.

“This is a transitionary phase for the industry,” said Basant Poddar, with the Federation of Indian Mineral Industries for Southern India. “Business and politics should be kept out as many of businessmen are simply caught in the line of crossfire.”

The mining scandal again underscores the need for India – Asia’s third largest economy after China and Japan – to overhaul strategic sectors including retail, property, and mining to raise growth and lure fresh investment.

Fearing a public backlash could bruise its chances in polls and erode a key southern voter base, analysts say the BJP will almost certainly force the populist Yediyurappa to resign.

Corruption pervades almost all levels of society in India despite a thriving democracy and a relatively independent judiciary. It has long been accepted as a fact of life.

Over the past year, however, public anger has risen sharply over particularly blatant abuses, stoked by activists and aggressive media and TV campaigns pushing for the creation of an independent ombudsman to step up the anti-corruption fight.


Speak up Mr Finance Minister!

July 28, 2011

It was sometime in October 2008, a rumour was doing the rounds furiously that the banks were seeing ferocious withdrawals and the situation could, within hours, develop into a run with serious systemic risks. Our reserves had plummeted so low that treasury heads in the banks had lost all faith in the reserve numbers being released by the State Bank and the prospect of default loomed. Then a rumour started that the lockers are going to be seized and some branches began to see panicked people coming in and hurriedly emptying out their contents.

I struggled with how to cover this. I didn’t want to do anything to fuel the rumours further, but could not ignore the fact that they exist and are producing real world outcomes. The best way for our channel to approach the issue was to try and get a comment from the finance minister on the whole affair. A brand new finance minister would likely be shy of speaking on the air about such a hot issue I figured, so maybe we should start the questioning with another topic and work our way to what we wanted.

President Asif Ali Zardari was on his first tour of the US in those days, and had just given an interview in which he famously announced that “Pakistan needs $100 billion” in assistance. That was our peg, we’d start by asking Shaukat Tarin what he thought of this announcement, where the $100 billion figure had come from, and then work around to the crisis facing the banking system.

I placed the call and Shaukat Tarin answered on the first ring.

“Can we talk to you on air about this $100 billion business?” I asked.

“Sure” came the prompt reply and then to my surprise he added, “but I also want to address these rumours doing the rounds regarding banks, can you make sure you ask me about that too?”

In days to come, I saw Tarin speaking on air to all other TV channels, in talk shows and bulletins, giving comments in print as well, breathing confidence back into a financial system shattered by the sudden withdrawal of liquidity.

His track record can be debated, but the media never had a harsh word to say about Shaukat Tarin, he never gave us the chance. Being accessible meant his version of things was always available. Look up the coverage; you’ll be hard-pressed to find any news story by any paper or channel that was unfavourable towards him or his competence. And when he left, he earned glowing tributes, one paper headlining its epitaph with these words: “An honourable exit for an honourable man”.

What a contrast it is then to see Hafeez Shaikh, the current finance minister, now past his twelfth month in office, standing in the lowest ebb of his tenure, grinning to himself in his little corner of oblivion. He’s been abandoned by his team and there’s not a word to be heard from him. He sits atop a fiscal train wreck, with his revenue numbers for the last fiscal year stripped of their credibility and bets being placed on when the first downward revisions will come on his projections for the forthcoming year, and not a peep from him. His core task as finance minister – to be an interlocutor between the political elites of this country and their creditors – lies in tatters. Yet he remains inaccessible.

It’s time that Hafeez Shaikh started worrying about how his tenure as finance minister will be remembered. He’s clearly not a man of words, and his track record inspires little confidence. What memorable words of his will remain after he is gone? What will be remembered as his finest hour? What will be his biggest success? When exactly did he draw the line in the sand, to say this far and no further? What was his moment, his hour of grace, and the time he played his hand and revealed his character? I have no answers to these questions, and nobody else does either. Nobody knows if there is anyone in charge of the economy any more, and given the danger stalking global markets, that’s a very worrying sign indeed.


Sarfraz Shah killing trial

July 28, 2011

Even though just one shot was fired, the Rangers men acted in unison when they encircled the unarmed Sarfraz Shah. They pointed their weapons at him and thus they were conjoined in the murder.

These were the answers the investigating officer in the case, DIG Sultan Khawaja gave to questions in the anti-terrorism court on Wednesday during the hearing of the high-profile case.

To a question from the defence, the DIG said that all the arms issued to the Rangers were used in the commission of the murder. Explaining the point further voluntarily, he said that the shots were fired by Shahid Zafar from his G-3 rifle but the other accused men also pointed their arms at the 22-year-old.

Thus, when the defence suggested that there was no plan, design, common intention or intention to terrorise people, the DIG replied that all these elements were there.

To a question on why he has not examined or recorded the statements of witnesses who described the act of killing Sarfraz Shah a murder, Khawaja said that all the staff and officers at the Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Park said that the incident had left them in shock and terror. He said besides this, nine other witnesses had said in their statements that they felt terror when they saw the footage of the incident on television. To another suggestion, he said that deceased was “neither an enemy nor a robber”.

After the completion of the testimony, Special Public Prosecutor Muhammad Khan Buriro said the prosecution rested.

Judge Bashir Ahmed Khoso adjourned the hearing till Thursday afternoon when all six accused men will be examined. They will also be allowed to produce any defence witness.

Jurisdiction

Meanwhile, the matter of the jurisdiction to hear the case was sent back to the anti-terrorism court that earlier rejected the argument that it could be heard by an ordinary court. The defence has been trying to have the case transferred from the anti-terrorism court.

On Wednesday, the Sindh High Court disposed of a plea to transfer the trial to a sessions court. The order was stated to be by consent as the bench proposed that the question of jurisdiction could be raised at the time of final arguments.

Syed Mehmood Alam Rizvi advocate, appearing for one of the accused men, Muhammad Afzal Khan, submitted that the joint investigation team’s report to the defence on Tuesday, explicitly holds that no element of terrorism was found in the alleged incident of June 8.

He submitted that while the instant revision application was pending hearing, new facts and details have surfaced. Now it is a case fit to be transferred from the ATC to an ordinary court. He said that this may also benefit the complainant, Salik Shah, who is the brother of the victim Sarfraz Shah. The parties may arrive at an out-of-court settlement.

Sarfraz Shah, 22, a resident of Hijrat Colony, was shot and injured by a Rangers man, who was part of a six-man strong mobile squad. Shah was turned over to the Rangers by a civilian Afsar Khan, who accused him of looting his friend and girlfriend at gunpoint.

Sindh Prosecutor General Shahadat Awan opposed the plea to transfer the case and said that this could not happen as the Supreme Court had ruled that prima facie it was to be challaned before an ATC. The counsel for the applicant, rebutting the arguments, said that the SC order was tentative and it left the decision to the Investigating Officer. He had to decide and file a charge sheet before “a court of competent jurisdiction” and thus a trial before an ATC was not according to the SC orders.


Govt-sponsored Karachi peace campaign begins

July 28, 2011

Pakistan Peoples Party’s (PPP) ministers kicked off Karachi’s ‘peace drive’ by hoisting white flags at the press club on Wednesday.

The government, under the directives of President Asif Ali Zardari, launched the campaign to end the target killings in Karachi.

Around half a dozen cabinet members belonging to the PPP, the ruling party, reached the press club with a large number of their workers who were chanting peace slogans.

Sindh Information Minister Sharjeel Inam Memon said that the effort was meant to bring peace to the city and restore its image as the ‘city of lights’. He said that PPP’s workers and leaders were going to play their role in this peace process. Moreover Sindh Chief Minister Qaim Ali Shah has also directed all cabinet members to be a part of the campaign.

“All political forces inside and outside parliament would be approached for cooperation in the peace mission. In fact, not only political parties, but even the judiciary will be sent the peace message,” said Memon. He explained that every institution should work for peace in its own limits.

He went on to say that Governor Dr Ishratul Ebad Khan has also promised to use his influence and extend his cooperation to make the peace drive successful.

Memon thanked Muttahida Qaumi Movement’s chief, Altaf Hussain, for his appeal to bring peace to the city. He urged the media to play a role and avoid reporting news that creates rather than resolves problems.

While answering a question, Memon criticised the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s leader, Nawaz Sharif, and said “he is not sharif [decent] because he ordered an attack on the judiciary. We are warning him again not to interfere in the affairs of the judiciary and let it work independently.” Memon said that “the Sharif brothers have been looting and plundering public wealth since 1985. They started their political career on the instigation of a dictator, General Ziaul Haq.”

Minister for Excise and Taxation Mukesh Kumar Chawala appealed to the minorities to participate in a peace rally, which was being organised from Sea View to the Karachi Press Club on Saturday. He said that they had started inviting different political and religious parties to participate.

Minister for Power Shazia Marri and Minister for Revenue Jam Mahtab Dahar also came.


The bad guys are better armed than us: IG

July 28, 2011

The problem in Karachi is long term, according to the Sindh Inspector General of Police (IGP) Wajid Ali Durrani.

The reporters questioning the IG at the officers’ darbar at Police Ground in the Cantonment area pounced on his vague observation that the violence in Karachi was not about to change any time soon.

“While the problem in Karachi will continue, the police is also responsible for upper Sindh,” he said, backpedalling hastily. “I meant to say that the former IG did not go out of Karachi to other parts of Sindh to find out the issues there.”

Durrani told Hyderabad’s finest that the defunct Citizens-Police Liaison Committee (CPLC) is to be replaced with a similar body which will comprise ten notable residents and volunteers in an attempt to take a fresh approach to control law and order. “Community policing is the modern way of crime control. It is most successful in Japan,” he said.

The IG pinned his hopes for peace on political committees with representatives of the Pakistan Peoples Party, Muttahida Qaumi Movement and Awami National Party. “People will not listen to me if I appeal for calm, but political leaders with influence in the city will be heeded.”

The committees will visit violence-hit areas and dissuade people from taking up arms. The IG emphasised that the law enforcement agencies can’t control the situation through force alone – politicians have to do their bit, especially when it comes to removing ethnic prejudices.

“Miscreants attack pockets of Sindhi, Urdu-speaking, Balochi and Pakhtun communities and run away, making it look like a certain community has attacked another.”

The IG also dismissed rumours of having seen the list of names involved in violence that has been handed over by a country in Africa. He said that the list was with the home minister, Manzoor Wassan, and 90 suspects have been arrested in connection with the recent Karachi violence.

“Although I can’t say with certainty that a particular foreign country is involved in the Karachi violence, at the same time I cannot rule anything out either,” he added. The police will use the Rs5 billion provided by President Asif Ali Zardari to buy new armoured personnel carriers, grenade launchers and other advanced weapons. “We realise that the criminals have more sophisticated arms than the police,” he observed darkly.

He announced new apartment buildings for policemen in Hyderabad similar to the 30,000 flats being constructed in Karachi.

He then asked the SSPs present to pick out plots for housing societies but was told that 54 acres of police land is under illegal occupation. “The land, located at a prime location near Rajputana Hospital, is police property,” said a sub-inspector. The IG asked SSP Pir Farid Jan Sarhandi to immediately set up a post there.The mounted police meanwhile, had their own woes to voice during the hour-long question session. One such policeman, Azizullah, complained that his officers do not pay for fodder and other expenses of the horses. “There are 12 mounted police personnel in Hyderabad and we pay for our horses’ food from our own pockets.”

Not to be left out, the traffic police complained about how they are not being given their share – 20% – from the fines that they collect from violators of traffic rules. The majority of the 19 complaints, however, were about delays in promotions and granting of the ‘son quota’. As expected, they were met with the usual assurances from the IG.


Infringing National Sovereignty In The Name Of The American President: Secret Bush Order Lets U.S. Raid Al Qaeda Without Regard For International Law

July 28, 2011

The United States military since 2004 has used broad, secret authority to carry out nearly a dozen previously undisclosed attacks against Al Qaeda and other militants in Syria, Pakistan and elsewhere, according to senior American officials.

These military raids, typically carried out by Special Operations forces, were authorized by a classified order that Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld signed in the spring of 2004 with the approval of President Bush, the officials said. The secret order gave the military new authority to attack the Qaeda terrorist network anywhere in the world, and a more sweeping mandate to conduct operations in countries not at war with the United States.

In 2006, for example, a Navy Seal team raided a suspected militants’ compound in the Bajaur region of Pakistan, according to a former top official of the Central Intelligence Agency. Officials watched the entire mission – captured by the video camera of a remotely piloted Predator aircraft – in real time in the C.I.A.’s Counterterrorist Center at the agency’s headquarters in Virginia 7,000 miles away.

Some of the military missions have been conducted in close coordination with the C.I.A., according to senior American officials, who said that in others, like the Special Operations raid in Syria on Oct. 26 of this year, the military commandos acted in support of C.I.A.-directed operations.

But as many as a dozen additional operations have been canceled in the past four years, often to the dismay of military commanders, senior military officials said. They said senior administration officials had decided in these cases that the missions were too risky, were too diplomatically explosive or relied on insufficient evidence.

More than a half-dozen officials, including current and former military and intelligence officials as well as senior Bush administration policy makers, described details of the 2004 military order on the condition of anonymity because of its politically delicate nature. Spokesmen for the White House, the Defense Department and the military declined to comment.

Apart from the 2006 raid into Pakistan, the American officials refused to describe in detail what they said had been nearly a dozen previously undisclosed attacks, except to say they had been carried out in Syria, Pakistan and other countries. They made clear that there had been no raids into Iran using that authority, but they suggested that American forces had carried out reconnaissance missions in Iran using other classified directives.

According to a senior administration official, the new authority was spelled out in a classified document called “Al Qaeda Network Exord,” or execute order, that streamlined the approval process for the military to act outside officially declared war zones. Where in the past the Pentagon needed to get approval for missions on a case-by-case basis, which could take days when there were only hours to act, the new order specified a way for Pentagon planners to get the green light for a mission far more quickly, the official said.

It also allowed senior officials to think through how the United States would respond if a mission went badly. “If that helicopter goes down in Syria en route to a target,” a former senior military official said, “the American response would not have to be worked out on the fly.”

The 2004 order was a step in the evolution of how the American government sought to kill or capture Qaeda terrorists around the world. It was issued after the Bush administration had already granted America’s intelligence agencies sweeping power to secretly detain and interrogate terrorism suspects in overseas prisons and to conduct warrantless eavesdropping on telephone and electronic communications.

Shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, Mr. Bush issued a classified order authorizing the C.I.A. to kill or capture Qaeda militants around the globe. By 2003, American intelligence agencies and the military had developed a much deeper understanding of Al Qaeda’s extensive global network, and Mr. Rumsfeld pressed hard to unleash the military’s vast firepower against militants outside the combat zones of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The 2004 order identifies 15 to 20 countries, including Syria, Pakistan, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and several other Persian Gulf states, where Qaeda militants were believed to be operating or to have sought sanctuary, a senior administration official said.

Even with the order, each specific mission requires high-level government approval. Targets in Somalia, for instance, need at least the approval of the defense secretary, the administration official said, while targets in a handful of countries, including Pakistan and Syria, require presidential approval.

The Pentagon has exercised its authority frequently, dispatching commandos to countries including Pakistan and Somalia. Details of a few of these strikes have previously been reported.

For example, shortly after Ethiopian troops crossed into Somalia in late 2006 to dislodge an Islamist regime in Mogadishu, the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations Command quietly sent operatives and AC-130 gunships to an airstrip near the Ethiopian town of Dire Dawa. From there, members of a classified unit called Task Force 88 crossed repeatedly into Somalia to hunt senior members of a Qaeda cell believed to be responsible for the 1998 American Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.

At the time, American officials said Special Operations troops were operating under a classified directive authorizing the military to kill or capture Qaeda operatives if failure to act quickly would mean the United States had lost a “fleeting opportunity” to neutralize the enemy.

Occasionally, the officials said, Special Operations troops would land in Somalia to assess the strikes’ results. On Jan. 7, 2007, an AC-130 struck an isolated fishing village near the Kenyan border, and within hours, American commandos and Ethiopian troops were examining the rubble to determine whether any Qaeda operatives had been killed.

But even with the new authority, proposed Pentagon missions were sometimes scrubbed because of bad intelligence or bureaucratic entanglements, senior administration officials said.

The details of one of those aborted operations, in early 2005, were reported by The New York Times last June. In that case, an operation to send a team of the Navy Seals and the Army Rangers into Pakistan to capture Ayman al-Zawahri, Osama bin Laden’s top deputy, was aborted at the last minute.

Mr. Zawahri was believed by intelligence officials to be attending a meeting in Bajaur, in Pakistan’s tribal areas, and the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations Command hastily put together a plan to capture him. There were strong disagreements inside the Pentagon and the C.I.A. about the quality of the intelligence, however, and some in the military expressed concern that the mission was unnecessarily risky.

Porter J. Goss, the C.I.A. director at the time, urged the military to carry out the mission, and some in the C.I.A. even wanted to execute it without informing Ryan C. Crocker, then the American ambassador to Pakistan. Mr. Rumsfeld ultimately refused to authorize the mission.

Former military and intelligence officials said that Lt. Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, who recently completed his tour as head of the Joint Special Operations Command, had pressed for years to win approval for commando missions into Pakistan. But the missions were frequently rejected because officials in Washington determined that the risks to American troops and the alliance with Pakistan were too great.

Capt. John Kirby, a spokesman for General McChrystal, who is now director of the military’s Joint Staff, declined to comment.

The recent raid into Syria was not the first time that Special Operations forces had operated in that country, according to a senior military official and an outside adviser to the Pentagon.

Since the Iraq war began, the official and the outside adviser said, Special Operations forces have several times made cross-border raids aimed at militants and infrastructure aiding the flow of foreign fighters into Iraq.

The raid in late October, however, was much more noticeable than the previous raids, military officials said, which helps explain why it drew a sharp protest from the Syrian government.

Negotiations to hammer out the 2004 order took place over nearly a year and involved wrangling between the Pentagon and the C.I.A. and the State Department about the military’s proper role around the world, several administration officials said.

American officials said there had been debate over whether to include Iran in the 2004 order, but ultimately Iran was set aside, possibly to be dealt with under a separate authorization.

Senior officials of the State Department and the C.I.A. voiced fears that military commandos would encroach on their turf, conducting operations that historically the C.I.A. had carried out, and running missions without an ambassador’s knowledge or approval.

Mr. Rumsfeld had pushed in the years after the Sept. 11 attacks to expand the mission of Special Operations troops to include intelligence gathering and counterterrorism operations in countries where American commandos had not operated before.

Bush administration officials have shown a determination to operate under an expansive definition of self-defense that provides a legal rationale for strikes on militant targets in sovereign nations without those countries’ consent.

Several officials said the negotiations over the 2004 order resulted in closer coordination among the Pentagon, the State Department and the C.I.A., and set a very high standard for the quality of intelligence necessary to gain approval for an attack.

The 2004 order also provided a foundation for the orders that Mr. Bush approved in July allowing the military to conduct raids into the Pakistani tribal areas, including the Sept. 3 operation by Special Operations forces that killed about 20 militants, American officials said.

Administration officials said that Mr. Bush’s approval had paved the way for Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to sign an order – separate from the 2004 order – that specifically directed the military to plan a series of operations, in cooperation with the C.I.A., on the Qaeda network and other militant groups linked to it in Pakistan.

Unlike the 2004 order, in which Special Operations commanders nominated targets for approval by senior government officials, the order in July was more of a top-down approach, directing the military to work with the C.I.A. to find targets in the tribal areas, administration officials said. They said each target still needed to be approved by the group of Mr. Bush’s top national security and foreign policy advisers, called the Principals Committee.


Punjab vs federation: PML-N vows to support judiciary in case it seeks military’s help

July 27, 2011

By Abdul Manan

The federal government is stalling on implementing the Supreme Court’s orders to cover up corrupt practices of its coalition partners, Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif has said.

“The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) will hold a party convention on July 27 after which we will hold a high-level party meeting to draw strategies to force the government to obey court rulings,” Shahbaz said at a press conference held on Tuesday at his Model Town residence in Lahore.

Announcing war against the federal government, he said that he was willing to sacrifice his own government to ensure that the judiciary’s verdicts in the corruption scandals, such as the Hajj scam and the National Insurance Company Ltd land scam, are honoured. “The PML-N will support the judiciary if it asks for the military’s help to implement its verdicts,” he said.

Shahbaz said that President Zardari is the biggest hurdle in the way of an independent judiciary. “Zardari wants Dogar courts from where he can get a ruling of his own liking,” he said.

Asked why the court is not initiating contempt proceedings, he said that it was the court’s prerogative and he cannot comment on it. However, he said that the PML-N will not be a silent spectator as the court is humiliated and will take direct action against the federal government. “Defying court rulings will be like spoiling the country’s basics. If needed, we will again launch a long march against the federal government,” he said.

Meanwhile, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) leader and former law minister Babar Awan has criticised Shahbaz’s speech saying he is ‘politicising’ judicial matters.

“The PML-N is trying to play the judicial card and will fail like [it did] in the past,” Awan told the media at the Governor House. “He has indirectly given a message to the federation that Punjab will defy it.”

He said that the chief justice of Pakistan should take suo motu notice of Shahbaz’s statement in which he has tried to provoke the people against the federal government.

Awan said that before announcing war, Shahbaz should review whether Punjab is itself complying with court orders or not. “The court has also given a verdict against current Lahore police chief for negligence in the Gojra incident but he continues to serve,” he said.

He said that Shahbaz has used unparliamentary language against President Zardari just to provoke the PPP. “There is no constitutional war between the executive and the judiciary in any province and I cannot understand who Shahbaz is challenging in his declaration of war,” Awan said.


Us-Afghan strategic partnership must be on Afghan terms

July 27, 2011

Afghan President Hamid Karzai says he will not negotiate his terms for a strategic partnership with the United States that will lay out the long-term U.S. role in Afghanistan.

Karzai said Tuesday that the U.S. must accept all of his conditions for a strategic partnership agreement, including an end to night raids and other military operations by American forces that could cause civilian casualties.

Addressing a gathering in Kabul, the Afghan leader also called on Afghan forces to rise to the challenge of taking control of security from international troops. President Karzai said Afghan forces will soon be able to protect their own country.

Some 33,000 American forces are set to leave Afghanistan by September of 2012. Last week, the first seven areas of Afghanistan were transitioned from NATO control to Afghan forces. Most foreign combat troops are set to leave Afghanistan by the end of 2014.

Violence has increased as Afghans begin taking security control from U.S. and NATO-led forces.

On Tuesday, Afghanistan’s National Directorate of Security said Afghan forces had foiled a plot to attack Kabul International Airport. NDS spokesman Lutfullah Mashal said insurgents had accumulated weapons near Kabul in order to attack the airport. Detained militants told security officials about the plot.

In southern Afghanistan, provincial officials say at least 22 insurgents and two police officers were killed in two separate clashes in Helmand province on Monday.

Elsewhere in Helmand, authorities say a roadside bomb killed two children on Monday.

In the north, NATO says four insurgents were killed Monday during separate operations in Jowzjan province. Five other insurgents were killed in a joint operation targeting a Taliban leader in the eastern province of Laghman on Monday.


Sindh government to initiate peace campaign

July 27, 2011

“We will spread the message of peace in the city through the families of those who have lost their lives in the violence,” said Sindh Information Minister Sharjeel Inam Memon. This is a part of the ‘peace campaign’ that the Sindh government will start on Wednesday.

Memon told a press conference on Tuesday that the government would accompany the affected family members to disturbed areas of the city and ask them to appeal to different groups in the sensitive areas to express tolerance and give up the rivalry.

The campaign is being launched due to the volatile situation of Karachi and will comprise walks, seminars and interactions between the government and the political parties as well as between the government and civil society members.

Memon said that the aim of the peace campaign is to bring the socio-economic condition of the city back to normal.

He explained that the government will start interacting with leaders from different political parties, NGOs and other civil society members and ask them to play their role in bringing the law and order situation under control.

“We appeal to the people of Karachi and other stakeholders to cooperate with the government and make the campaign successful. The government will give a special award to those who play the best role during the campaign,” announced Memon.

The information minister went on to say that they had not only organised seminars and walks, but the government together with members of civil society organisations would erect banners and distribute pamphlets in all the areas of the city including markets, hospitals, schools, colleges and universities.

“We will ask our celebrities and national heroes to play their role in maintaining the law and order situation through radio, film and other fields,” he said.

He said that PPP workers would start the campaign from different areas and would also appeal to people to hoist ‘white flags’, symbolising peace, on their buildings and markets. He announced that the government had started printing peace stickers, which would be distributed on a large-scale among public and private transporters.

Religious scholars would be approached and asked to deliver peace sermons during Juma and prayer times in their mosques.

Memon explained that President Asif Ali Zardari has directed them to bring peace in the city and this initiative is being launched on his directions.

“During the campaign we will not indulge in recriminations ,” he said. Along with the peace drive the government would continue administrative efforts to maintain order in the city.

PPP’s MPA Imdad Pitafi and MPA Mukesh Kumar Chawala were also present at the conference with Memon.


Is this the Obama doctrine?

July 27, 2011

Nothing seems to be going right in Pakistan-US relations. Just when we were wondering what Pakistan needed to do to restore some semblance of normalcy to its ties with the US, the latter decided to arrest Ghulam Nabi Fai, long a voice against violence and an advocate for peaceful resolution of the Kashmir issue. Are the two agencies playing games with each other?

Next, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton decided to serve another ‘demand note’ on Pakistan and that too while in India, which made it needlessly provocative. Her other remarks at the end of the US-India strategic dialogue were not helpful either, particularly her support for India’s quest for transit rights across South and Central Asia. It was, however, in the southern port city of Chennai that Clinton became India’s unabashed cheerleader, stressing that India-US ties would be the defining partnership of the 21st century, while nudging India to play a more assertive role across the Asia-Pacific region, arguing that it “is an ambitious agenda, but we can afford to be ambitious.” Her assertions must have fallen on receptive ears, as Indian Foreign Minister Krishna confirmed that “we discussed our shared interest in peaceful and stable Asia-Pacific and the Indian Ocean region architecture in the region”. As if to demonstrate how much the two are in sync, it was announced that the Indian president would be undertaking official visits to South Korea and Mongolia, two countries of special interest to China, while the joint statement revealed that “India, the US and Japan plan to commence a trilateral dialogue at the senior official level.”

Increasingly, Clinton has been sounding as if she has joined those in the US who are convinced of the need to galvanise South East Asian nations to confront China now, rather than in the future, when it may no longer be feasible. A year ago, at the annual Asean Regional Forum (ARF) meeting in Hanoi, Clinton had waded into the choppy waters of the South China Sea, where China and its South Asian neighbours are embroiled in a contentious dispute, declaring America’s support for the right to freedom of navigation. Suspecting it as America’s effort to fish in troubled waters, China was constrained to warn the US and other major powers to stay out of disputes in the region. At last week’s ARF annual meeting, Clinton renewed her efforts to encourage South East Asian nations to be more assertive in their claims to the strategically located and potentially lucrative waters of the South China Sea.

Clinton’s remarks in Chennai appear to flesh out the bare bones of the US-India strategic partnership envisaged by Bush and the neocons. Its scale is huge and ambition unlimited, as Clinton herself admitted. Though an Indian Ocean power, the US is committing itself to making India a Pacific Ocean power as well, and for this purpose encouraging her to work with Japan on security issues relating to the region. The East Asia Summit would be turned into the premier regional forum for dealing with security issues and India invited as an observer, for the first time, in the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. Nothing could be more provocative to China.

Do Clinton’s exhortations in Chennai represent the Obama doctrine for ‘containment’ of China? Getting India into this arrangement may sound like a stroke of genius, but could turn out to be a huge folly as well. Coming as it does at a time when the American economy shows no sign of recovery and its debt to China exceeds $1 trillion, Clinton and company are engaging in an audacious gamble and one that is likely to add greatly to regional tension and turmoil.

Given Pakistan’s strategic relations to China and continuing tensions with India, the Obama administration’s encouragement of India to become more assertive and ambitious in both South and South East Asia demonstrate the limitations of US-Pakistan relations, while creating huge challenges for Pakistan.


Talks in New Delhi

July 27, 2011

Talks between Pakistan and India in July have become a regular feature – and for some that is perhaps an end in itself. Last time, the venue was Thimphu and the year before that Sharm-el-Sheikh. Both meetings were held amid mutual suspicion and acrimony. In the latter, the Indian prime minister made some very encouraging remarks but it seems that his resolve was undercut by vested interests in the Indian establishment who did not want to see ties between the two countries return to any semblance of normality after the 26/11. The foreign ministers of both countries are scheduled to meet in New Delhi today, with the hawks on both sides yet again wishing that they come to naught. It has been reported that some confidence-building measures related to Kashmir (such as increasing the number of trading days, opening more bus routes and allowing more entry points through the Line of Control) may come out of the meeting, but it remains to be seen whether other pressing matters of conflict will be addressed in any realistic manner.

As with the previous July meetings, the New Delhi summit will be heavily focused on 26/11. Indian External Affairs Minister SM Krishna has already made it clear that he will demand that Pakistan bring the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks to justice. This is a clear reference to Hafiz Saeed and several members of the Lashkar-e-Taiba who are being tried in a Pakistani court (though the case seems to have dragged on inordinately long). An additional concern for Pakistan will be the performance of newly-minted Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar. There is concern that her lack of experience makes her unsuitable for the job and this wasn’t helped by an undiplomatic remark on India she made soon upon assuming office. That said, the talks do present an opportunity for those on either side who wish for peace between the two countries to assert themselves. In Pakistan, all political parties are agreed on the need for a lasting peace with India, while across the border perhaps the biggest proponent of harmonious coexistence with Pakistan seems to be none other than Indian Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh.


10 militants killed in clashes with Yemeni troops

July 27, 2011

Yemeni forces said on Tuesday they killed 10 al Qaeda fighters who attacked their camp outside the southern town of Zinjibar, the scene of fierce clashes between government troops and militants.

Islamists have seized several areas in the surrounding province of Abyan in recent months — raising fears in the West and neighbouring Saudi Arabia that al Qaeda’s Yemen wing is expanding, taking advantage of a security vacuum left by prolonged anti-government protests.

Yemen has been rocked by more than five months of demonstrations against the rule of President Ali Abdullah Saleh. The country was left in political limbo when Saleh flew to Saudi Arabia for medical treatment following a bomb attack on his palace last month.

Yemen’s army launched an offensive last week to push back militants in Abyan, on Yemen’s southern coast, but has so far only regained one military site.

An army spokesman, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the al Qaeda fighters attacked one of its camps on Monday night.

“The 10 militants were killed by heavy shells before they could make it to the military camp,” he said, adding that one of those killed was a senior member of the militant group.

An army general told Yemeni television late on Monday the army’s offensive in Abyan was facing fierce resistance.

“Our forces are engaged in difficult clashes with al Qaeda in Zinjibar,” said Mohammed al-Somali. “The fighting is large and violent, on a larger scale than most would probably imagine.”

About 90,000 people have fled the violence in Abyan, most of them heading to the nearby port city of Aden, which lies east of a strategic shipping strait that channels about 3 million barrels of oil a day.

Security analysts have cast doubt on Yemen’s reports that its forces have killed dozens of al Qaeda militants and several senior leaders, noting that many of those fighting in Abyan are likely members of other militant groups.

“It wouldn’t surprise me if there were puritanical militants who want to see closer adherence to what the consider to be Islamic values but didn’t necessarily share the trans national agenda of AQAP (al Qaeda’s Yemen wing),” said security analyst Jeremy Binnie, of IHS Jane’s.

Saleh’s opponents accuse him of letting his forces ease their grip around areas suspected of hosting militants, in order to convince foreign governments that only he stands in the way of a militant takeover.

Both the United States and neighbouring Saudi Arabia, targets of foiled attacks by al Qaeda’s Yemen branch, are wary of growing turmoil in Yemen, which they fear gives room to the militant group to operate.

Washington and Riyadh hoped to bring more stability to Yemen by pushing Saleh into signing a Gulf-brokered transition plan, but the 69-year-old leader has backed out of inking the deal three times.

He has instead vowed to return to Yemen and start a national dialogue, angering protesters in the streets who are still insisting on his resignation.


The budget is to be altered, the system itself will not change

July 27, 2011

The commissionerate system has not become a law and the government will not make any amendments to it, said Chief Minister Sindh Syed Qaim Ali Shah has said that.

He told the media gathered outside the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan’s Golden Jubilee Conference that “we will resolve the concerns of our friends administratively, otherwise there is no need to touch the commissionerate system”.

In what appears to be a unanimous assumption, most government ministers were of the view that the government was open to amendments in the newly revived commissionerate system. The amendments were meant to pacify the disgruntled former coalition partner, Muttahida Qaumi Movement. Hence, the chief minister’s revelation came as a first to many.

The government does not plan to carry out an operation in the city, the CM said in response to a question about violence in Karachi. Target killings, however, are a political issue and the government has begun interacting with different political parties to bring the Karachi situation back to normal.

The commisionerate budget

The commissioners and deputy commissioners have been made responsible for resolving financial issues when it comes to salary and recurring expenditure in their areas.

This was decided at a meeting held at the CM House under the supervision of Chief Minister Shah to review the budgetary changes that would have to be made to fit the new system.

Shah told the Sindh Chief Secretary to hold a meeting today (Wednesday) to discuss all issues including the allocation of the budget for development schemes and monitoring the evaluation system. He asked him to submit a report if necessary.

The meeting was informed that the allocation of three-month salaries with the POL and other essential heads have already been released to all departments so that no government employee will face any problem.

After the 18 amendment was promulgated, devolved departments were made integral parts of the respective provincial departments. The CM said that all changes should be made within three months.

The meeting was attended by Finance Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah, Chief Secretary Sindh Raja Muhammad Abbas, Additional Chief Secretary (P&D) Muhammad Ishaque Lashari, Accountant General Sindh Azam Khan, Secretary Finance Sindh Naveed Kamran Baloch, Secretary Local Government Ali Ahmed Lund, Secretary to Chief Minister Sindh Alamuddin Bullo, Additional Accountant General Sindh, a representative of the Sindh Police IG and others.


Rangers are not terrorists, declares JIT report

July 27, 2011

The defence in the Sarfraz Shah case finally has the information it needs to have the case tried as a simple murder rather than an act of terrorism.

The Joint Investigating Team (JIT) has submitted its report that is crucial to its stand that the murder of Sarfraz Shah does not fall within the scope of Anti Terrorism Act (ATA 1997).

The development came during the hearing of a revision application by a Sindh High Court (SHC) division bench comprising Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Muhammad Tasnim on Tuesday.

Muhammad Afzal’s lawyer, Mehmood Alam Rizvi, is seeking the transfer of this case from the Anti Terrorism Court (ATC) to an ordinary sessions court.

“You have stated that there was no terrorism because there was no public present at the park,” said Justice Ahmed. “It is matter of evidence. The ATC decide whether it falls into the ambit of terrorism or relevant court as the ATC holds the daily proceedings on the case.”

Rizvi then drew the bench’s attention to the order of the Supreme Court which directed the Investigation Officer (IO) to file the case’s charge sheet “before a court of competent jurisdiction.”

He said that the JIT report was being kept from the defence which was affecting the interests of the accused. The IO, DIG Sultan Ali Khawaja, immediately produced the report and distributed copies to the defence when the bench asked why the defence had not been given copies of the report that stated that the murder did not cause any terror.

On the request of Counsel Shaukat Hayat Advocate, the court told the IO to submit the report before the ATC holding the trial.

Earlier, Prosecutor General Sindh Shahdat Awan opposed requests to make the JIT report public as he felt the charge sheet had already been submitted thus making the report immaterial.

The court later put off further proceedings in transfer plea till Wednesday as Mehmood Alam Rizvi advocate, counsel for applicant sought time to go through the JIT report.

IOs statement all for the defence

In a turn of events, DIG Sultan A Khawaja – who was appointed to the case specially by Supreme Court for his ‘good reputation’ – seemed to mince words in his statement before the ATC-I judge Bashir Ahmed Khoso.

He told the court he was appointed IO in the case and how he investigated the three FIRs including the two against the deceased, Sarfraz Shah, that were later declared null and void and closed as ‘B-Class’.

The IO statement as a prosecution witness (PW) was based on the footage of the incident. He said that he saw the accused, Afsar Khan, dragging the victim and turning him over to the Rangers who encircled him and shot him.

He heard the boy begging for mercy saying that “he had no other choice and that the pistol is a toy pistol”. “Instead of waiting for an ambulance, they should have shifted the injured boy in their mobile which is seen standing in the footage, this makes their intentions clear,” said Khawaja.

Anxious to get the JIT report on record, DIG brought out the report but faced resistance from Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Muhammad Khan Buriro who claimed that the IO is submitting the JIT report on his own motion, while he was testifying as a witness.

SPP Buriro told the Khawaja that the SHC has ordered him to submit the report before ATC trial court but he was producing it as part of his testimony.

To the defence’s delight, Khawaja submitted that “the Rangers officials were on official duty, there was no pre-planning and no intention to commit terrorism”.

The SPP conducting the examination in chief sought a clarification – they felt that the IO was deliberately favouring the defence in his testimony. However, the court said that it can clearly see that the IO is saying things that he would have said in a cross examination.

As the defence leapt to their feet to object, the court asked them to wait for their turn to cross examine the witness. Either way, “what is left to his testimony? He has already said everything that favours the defence’s case” the court observed right before the case was set aside till Wednesday.

The court rejected applications by the defence asking to visit the crime scene and to summon the host of the programme ‘News Beat’ who interviewed the cameraman who recorded the incident Abdul Salam Soomro.


The art of bribing in India

July 26, 2011

There’s been a lot of debate on the Lokpal Bill, and the venality of netas and babus. But what about ordinary citizens? Though we often have no choice but to pay a bribe, isn’t it within our power to refuse to do so and break the cycle of corruption? With this thought, DNA, over the next few days brings you a series where eminent persons speak about putting their foot down.

The art of living has become the fad among the rich and so has the art of bribery.

The first time somebodysought a ‘subornment’ from me, it was still a developing art. That was sometime around 1981 (in the pre-Bofors era). As an ordinary litigant, I had filed a suit in the Ahmedabad civil court. I had to swear an affidavit in a related application. I was told to go to a room where an officer gave me a board that had the oath printed in different languages.

I read the one written in English and eagerly waited for the impact. I was still quite new to the judicial system and tried to be accurate with my pronunciation.

The officer (who I came to know was an assistant registrar later on) sadly shook his head and told me it was not good enough. My second effort also failed. I was directed to go back and meet the clerk who was helping me file the suit and learn the procedure!

I narrated my problems to the clerk, who merely smiled. He asked me whether I noticed the half-open draw of the officer’s table. Litigants who had to swear an affidavit were required to drop a fiver in; the pronunciation was immaterial thereafter. I was very disturbed and refused to pay. Being genetically obstinate, I informed the clerk that I will continue to read out the printed oath till the officer signed the affidavit even if it took the whole day.

The clerk went inside the room and within minutes came out with the affidavitsigned. I do not know whattranspired inside. Apparently the officer had liked my pronunciation!

After about 30 years, when Annas and Ramdevs are ‘sacrificing their food’ for the sake of a new law against corruption, I think the officer had already thought of a mechanism to avoid the Lokpal. A half-open draw and no demand. That was a new art of collecting ‘black money’.

My good friend Maheshbhai, who has an anecdote for every occasion, had one on the ‘burning issue’ of the day. A traditional sethia (money-lender) had narrated this story. He used to stash a lot of cash and one day theincome tax raid took place. The sethia produced his wealth and the income tax officer berated him for stashing so much cash.

The sethia politely told him that now that the raid was over, he had to complete the customary formalities. He then brought out his cheque book and offered it to the officer. While eager to get his share, the IT officer had to scold the sethia for offering him a cheque.

The sethia replied : “Sir, now you know why I have to keep so much cash in my house. High-ranking officers like you – sale-tax, civic officers – visit my house for some inspection or the other. None of you take a cheque payment but I have to do my duty.

Tell me, sir, what do I do?” This is the vicious question that capitalism has no answer for.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 59 other followers