My freedom fighter, your terrorist

February 21, 2013

Spearhead Research Analysis

afza-guru_hafiz-saeedOne man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist. Afzal Guru remains one such example, who was hanged on 9 February 2013, convicted for attacking the Indian Parliament in 2002. Guru’s hanging has caused some disturbance in the civil and social order. The Muslim minority of India that enjoys a majority in the Kashmir Valley sparked out in protest of the hanging. Three youngsters have died in these protests and Yasin Malik (chief of Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front), a charismatic leader, went on a hunger strike in Islamabad, urging Indian Civil Society to speak out against the inhumane treatment of Guru. But one rotten apple threatens the stock, and for the Indian government Malik poses a threat. He leads the Muslims of Jammu and Kashmir in changing lines of citizenry. What government can tolerate that?

The right to self determination of Kashmiris is theoretically undeniable, yet so little has been done to materialize it. We can go back to 1947 when the United Nations never held the much awaited plebiscite, and the Muslim majority of Kashmir, who had voted for Pakistan, was forcefully occupied by the Indian Army. What started as a nascent freedom struggle in 1947 has progressively intensified with the simultaneous deployment of Dogra guards, provincial armed constabulary, Air force squadrons and Army brigades (with a strength of 9 divisions in the Valley alone). With such policing tactics being established on the Indian government’s orders, it is highly doubtful that the Muslims of Kashmir can ever integrate as normal citizens in wholehearted Mother India.

The relationship between Kashmir and Pakistan is also two-fold: in 1947 Islamabad struck a deal with Muzaffarabad (known as the Karachi deal) and 1974, AJ&K government gave Islamabad considerable authority, only through a protective shield: the Kashmir Council. The struggle for separatism led by parties like JKLF (Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front) excludes the possibility that problems they face might be less constitutional, and more administrative. Implying that the instability in the region has more to do with the Kashmir Council, and less with constitutional amendment, or more specifically that the solution lies within the current constitutional framework. But Kashmir’s story is incomplete without considering both the Pakistan and Indian side on the same canvas.

The Indian Occupied Kashmir becomes a different, and a relatively tragic story. With an escalating sense of their right to self determination, and more and more Kashmiri youth pushing the lines of citizenry that have been drawn by the Indian state, the conflict has become uglier over the decades. Since 1989 between 50,000 and 100,000 Kashmiris have been killed at the hands of Indian Army. The numbers of disappearances in the Kashmir Valley alone are at least 300 since 1990. The Indian government or any of the agencies operating in the region have ignored this issue completely, with only the possibility of ‘silent executions’ of the missing at the hands of the Indian state. Cutting off the wild corners of this periphery, repressing anti-state elements remains a common tactic. But worse in the long run is the tendency of the state to covertly label the freedom fighter ‘the terrorist’. This has become a very common phenomenon and a very dangerous one. Kashmiri freedom fighters have been time and again convicted under the Indian Terrorism Act. The more recent example of the misuse of such labels was witnessed last week when a PIL was filed in the Punjab and Haryana HC (India) for dismissing Yasin Malik’s Indian passport for partaking in anti-national activities.

The term ‘anti-national activity’ is a very dangerous one. Firstly, we must address the elephant in the room: Yasin is a freedom fighter struggling for new lines of citizenry, not settling for the current constitutional framework. Secondly, the anti-state label was sparked by his choice of company, a photograph of him with Hafiz Saeed, another ‘terrorist’. Whether or not Hafiz Saeed is a terrorist is a debatable concern, what it really takes to become a terrorist apart from a beard, Islamic outlook and rebellion frankly is uncertain. Guru was termed as such, and now so is Hafiz. By protesting for a more humane way to execute Guru in Pakistan, sitting next to Saeed, Malik seems to be treading on very thin ice.

It is so telling that a man who challenges the current order of oppression risks being labeled a terrorist without any need for concrete evidence. The Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front exists for the very purpose of a free state of Kashmir, at the very least free from claws of a growingly oppressive state that sparks more rebellion, more violence and more passion. If the Indian society was to hear out the Kashmiri Liberation leader, they would realize his demands are not so unreasonable. Yasin Malik only asks for the right of Mohammad Afzal Guru’s family to his body (that’s what the hunger strike was for). But in a more holistic picture he blames such executions for pushing a seemingly peaceful people towards resorting to violent tactics (after the execution of JKLF co-founder Maqbool Bhat in 1984).

Yasin’s struggle, the recent execution and the tens of thousands killed in Indian occupied Kashmir have unfortunately been shoved into the waiting room of a ‘globalized’ 21 stcentury where Pakistan is keen on making peace with mighty India, not bringing our suffering Kashmiris in the picture. As Malik once stated in an interview; just because we don’t have oil wells the world is not interested in our suffering. And the sad reality remains economic gain is the only incentive. As for protesting as a right of every citizen: Indians as well as Pakistanis should be looking at the meat before the label. The right to question the state must not be snatched in a democratic setup, nor should the right to protest. For the difference between an authoritarian/dictatorial state and a democracy is the citizen’s right to challenge the status quo.


Area 14/8: Who will provide affirmative action in India?

February 8, 2013

Area 14/8

Consumed with weapon purchases, maritime capabilities and external threats from China and Pakistan, India has it seems neglected to peek at the state of affairs within its own boundaries. In the past few months, multiple incidents infringing the right of freedom of speech have occurred which has prompted writer Salman Rushdie to smear India with his “cultural emergency” allegation.

Although Rushdie’s credibility is uncertain and his agenda equally debatable, his accusation rings of the truth. India’s cultural intellect, its writers, poets, film makers and artists are being censured if their opinion and expression does not conform to the mainstream perceptions of India. Recently, a Tamil film called Vishwaroopam was condemned by Muslim religious groups in Tamil Nadu since it projected Muslims in a negative light. The government decided to ban the release of the film claiming that they lacked sufficient police forces to monitor all cinema houses for riots. Vishwaroopam’s producer, Kamal Haasan was so disillusioned that he threatened to leave India for a secular state abroad. Eventually, he agreed to cut some scenes from the film.

Elsewhere, renowned sociologist, Ashis Nandy, was attacked for insulting unprivileged classes by drawing links between corruption and “other backward classes, scheduled casters and scheduled tribes” at the Jaipur Literary Festival. A case was registered against him by Rajpal Meena, Chairperson of the SC/ST Rajasthan Manch, and subsequently, he was charged with the Prevention of Atrocities Act.

The controversial Salman Rushdie also made headlines when he accused the West Bengal government of deliberately hatching a plan to prevent his participation in Kolkata Literary Meet for the promotion of his new novel, “Midnight’s Children”. Even last year, protests and death threats had compelled him to cancel his visit to the Jaipur Literature Festival.

There are many other instances where unconventional news or statements have been targeted. India ranked a shocking 140th out of 179 countries on the Press Freedom index, issued by Reporters Without Borders. Reporter Soorinje would attest to this fact. He was arrested for multiples offences including criminal conspiracy, rioting with deadly weapons and using criminal force on a woman with the intention of outraging her modesty. Soorinje’s report on an attack on a birthday celebration involving Muslims at a homestay in Mangalore had held right wing extremists Hindu Jagarana Vedike responsible. Similarly, two women were arrested in last November when they Facebook comments offended followers of Bal Thackeray.

India should not be singled out for rising social discontent over freedom of speech. There are many such cases present in modernized societies too. The real issue concerning India is why the government chooses to be a part of this oppression? This is the government which likes to highlight itself as a democratic pluralistic nation where people of different religions, ethnicities, races and social statuses reside in harmony.

The government uses the maintenance of law and order as a justification for its extreme measures. But is law and order code for protecting parties’ mandate? In West Bengal similar to Tamil Nadu, people believed extreme steps were taken by the government to prevent any ill-will with Muslim voters. Are these infringements on the freedom of speech a political game only? Politicians may indeed be using cultural intellectuals as easy targets to keep the public distracted from pressing issues like poverty and unemployment.

It may not be just that the government is afraid of extremists; it may even share the same sentiments. Many state officials include hardliners like members of the Bharatiya Janata Party( BJP) sparking suspicions about state-sponsored terrorism. India’s Home Minister admitted to the involvement of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and BJP in promoting terrorism within the country and placing the blame on minority communities. Just recently, BJP was very vocal in banning Pakistani writers from attending a literary festival in India.

Freedom of speech is guaranteed in the Indian Constitution under Article 19. However, this freedom is subject to certain limitations such as “public order”, “decency or morality” and “security of the State”. The Supreme Court seems to be maintaining a low profile in controlling the government’s outbursts of actions. In Nandy’s case,for example, it stayed the arrest but also supported the state’s response saying that an “idea” is capable of inflicting harm.

Indian has failed to implement affirmative action. Since the government is not longer impartial, it is now up to the masses to reclaim their right to the freedom of speech.


The Amazing Indian Army

January 17, 2013

Area 14/8

Though western media have a soft corner for India,as they consider it a largest democracy of the world and a secular state,reports abound that India’s security forces use torture and rape as a weapon to punish,intimidate,humiliate and degrade the victims in Kashmir and elsewhere in India. The pattern of Army’s misconduct is also glaringly observed when contingent of Indian army performs duties as UN peacekeeping mission abroad. In Congo, army personnel raped women that resulted in unlawful pregnancies. Twelve officers and thirty-nine soldiers were probed in Meerut,Uttar Pradesh,India,for sexually abusing the local women and for having fathered children while on UN peacekeeping mission in Congo in 2008. UN Commission found DNA evidence of children born to Congo women,having distinct Indian features. UN authorities are putting pressure on Indian Government to investigate the issue. Unfortunately Indian media insinuated Pakistani spy agency “ISI” to protect a career officer of Indian Army employed as Instructor in Bangladesh Staff College who was caught with his pants down with a Bangladeshi woman by some vigilant eye of camera.

The Indian soldiers had exploited the war torn women of Congo,and sexual abuse cases reached into hundreds. These girls and women were raped either through coercion or under deceit of food items and Indian-made cosmetics. Indian brigade commander in Congo accused Pakistani soldiers of such violations to avert the blame. UN authorities ordered DNA tests. UN authorities informed Indian government and asked for legal proceeding against these officers and soldiers. Indian efforts of accusing Pakistani soldiers were refuted due to DNA test. Following the allegations,the regiment in which the officers and soldiers were serving was recalled from the Congo and attached to the Western Command headquarters. Earlier too,there have been allegations of sexual abuse and graft against Indian Army officers and soldiers serving in UN missions in the Congo. In March 2008,three officers were charged with sexual abuse of a local woman while on a holiday in South Africa. In 2007,there were allegations that some of the Indian peacekeepers had exchanged food and information with the locals for obtaining gold from rebels in North Kivu in the Congo.

However,there is no parallel to the atrocities perpetrated on Kashmiris in Indian Held Kashmir where Indian soldiers’ stories of rape and murder abound. In order to suppress the freedom movement in IOK Indian Army used religious prejudice and hatred against Muslims while using rape as a weapon against Kashmiri women,whereas the Indian authorities turned a blind to their heinous crimes. Hence,the habitual criminals not only got away with their crime against Muslim women in IOK but also got promotions and postings of their choices. Rape by Army officers/soldiers was taken as part of accepted military norm/culture. On 29th May,2009,two girls Aasiya and Neelofar were reportedly raped and murdered by Indian soldiers in Shopian. The government almost shelved the case after the concocted inquiry report stated that Aasiya slipped and fell in the ravine and Neelofar tried to save her,but both drowned in the ravine. On 29th May 2011,a complete shutdown was observed in Shopian town in Indian occupied Kashmir to mark the second anniversary of rape and murder of two Kashmiri women,Aasiya and Neelofar by Indian soldiers.

With the release of its 2009 country report on India,the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) had placed India on its “Watch List” in August 2009. USCIRF said India earned the Watch List designation due to the disturbing increase in communal violence against religious minorities – specifically Christians in Orissa in 2008 and Muslims in Gujarat in 2002 – and the largely inadequate response from the Indian government to protect the rights of religious minorities. “It is extremely disappointing that India,which has a multitude of religious communities,has done so little to protect and bring justice to its religious minorities” said Leonard Leo,USCIRF chair. “USCIRF’s India chapter was released in August 2009 to mark the first anniversary of the anti-Christian violence in Orissa.” In 2008 in Orissa,the murder of Swami Saraswati by Maoist rebels in Kandhamal sparked a prolonged and destructive campaign targeting Christians in Orissa,resulting in attacks against churches and individuals. But the West rather played down the gory incident.

Nevertheless,some human rights organizations have been exposing Indian soldiers and officers involved in sex scandals and rapes. Since the Indian government crackdown against Kashmiris in the disputed territory of Kashmir began in earnest in January 1990,after Kashmiris had started struggle in 1989. Rape by Indian security forces most often occurs during crackdowns,cordon-and-search operations during which men are held for identification in parks or schoolyards while security forces search their homes. In these situations,the security forces frequently engage in collective punishment against the civilian population by assaulting residents and burning their homes. Rape has also occurred frequently during reprisal attacks on civilians. Women who are the victims of rape are often stigmatised,and their testimony and integrity impugned. Social attitudes which cast the woman and not her attacker,as the guilty party often enjoys clout with the judiciary,making rape cases difficult to prosecute and leaving women unwilling to press charges.

According to a 1994 United Nations publication from 1990 to 1996,882 women were reportedly gang-raped by security forces in Jammu and Kashmir. A study done by Medecins Sans Frontieres in mid-2005 revealed that Kashmiri women we among the worst sufferers of sexual violence in the world. It further mentioned at since the beginning of the armed struggle in Kashmir in 1989,sexual violence was routinely perpetrated on Kashmiri women,with 11.6 per cent of respondents saying they were victims of sexual abuse. Interestingly,the figure is much higher than that of Sierra Leone,Sri Lanka and Chechnya. UNO had accused Indian army in writing of rape of Congolese women by its officers and soldiers. Previously such accusations were raised by Kashmiri and Indian minorities but were never listened to. Nobody sympathized with innocent women of Kashmir and minorities whose honor was targeted deliberately by Indian army personnel. International media withheld such news of rape and murder because the West has interest in the market of plus one-billion population.

In Sri Lanka

The IPKF was soon to earn the acronym – Innocent People Killing Force and a series of encounters will remind Jaffna Tamils how wonderful India had treated the Tamil people. Indian reply by Brig Kahlon for rape charges were “the Indian army are not angels….rape happens even in the West”. These are just a few of the examples of IPKF’s war crimes in Sri Lanka against the Tamil people India is now so concerned about.

  • 12 October 1987 – IPKF attacks village of Kokuvil killing over 40 civilians’ in retaliation for loosing 29 Indian commandoes at the Jaffna University raid.
  • 21 October 1987 – Deepavali,68 innocent Tamils shot and killed by IPKF inside Jaffna Hospital including hospital doctors,nurses,staff and patients. Dr. Sivapathasuntharan who entered the hospital the next day was also killed by the IPKF.
  • 21 November 1987 – Trincomalee,a IPKF soldier kills 7 civilians and injures 4 by indiscriminate firing.
  • August 1989 – Velvettiturai,64 Sri Lankan Tamil civilians killed by the IPKF.
  • More than a 100 Tamil civilian bodies were found in Chunnakam,Mallakam,Uduvil,Manipay,Maruthanamadam and Inuvil – all deaths attributed to the IPKF.
  • Amnesty International Report 1988 (Jan-Dec 1987) quotes local magistrate in North Sri Lanka finding seven cases of rape by IPKF. http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA37/030/1990/en/1520f8d1-17d4-…
  • A book on India’s war crimes against Tamil civilians was released in April 2011 in New Delhi titled “In the Name of Peace:IPKF Massacres of Tamils in Sri Lanka” documented by the Northeast Secretariat on Human Rights (NESoHR) and published by the Delhi Tamil Students Union. The book covers 12 massacres committed by the IPKF.

We do not deny the cultural affinities shared between India and Sri Lanka,we do not deny the close ties that have existed over centuries but inspite of such ties India has gone on to commit the unthinkable upon a nation that has done India no harm.

Indian atrocities in Kashmir

“As the conflict in Kashmir enters its fourth year,central and state authorities have done little to stop the widespread practice of rape by Indian security forces in Kashmir. Indeed,when confronted with the evidence of rape,time and again the authorities have attempted to impugn the integrity of the witnesses,discredit the testimony of physicians or simply deny the charges everything except order a full inquiry and prosecute those responsible for rape”.
(Asia Watch and Physicians for Human Rights,May 09,1993)


“Since January 1990,rape by Indian occupation forces has become more frequent. Rape most often occurs during crackdowns,cordon and search operations during which men are held for identification in parks or schoolyards while security forces search their homes. In raping them,the security forces are attempting to punish and humiliate the entire community.”
(‘Pain in Kashmir:A Crime of War’issued jointly by Asia Watch and Physicians for Human Rights,May 09,1993)

“By beginning TV cameras and prohibiting the presence in Kashmir of the International Red Cross and of human rights organization,the Indian authorities have tried to keep Kashmir out of the news.”
(`Kashmiri crisis at the flash point’,The Washington Times,by columnist Cord Meyer,April 23,1993)

“(On February 23,1991),at least 23 women were reportedly raped in their homes at gunpoint (at Kunan Poshpora in Kashmir). Some are said to have been gang-raped,others to have been raped in front of their children …The youngest victim was a girl of 13 named Misra,the oldest victim,name Jana,was aged 80″.
(Amnesty International,March 1992)

“The most common torture methods are severe beatings,sometimes while the victim is hung upside down,and electric shocks. People have also been crushed with heavy rollers,burned,stabbed with sharp instruments,and had objects such as chilies or thick sticks forced into their rectums. Sexual mutilation has been reported”.
(Amnesty International,March 1992)

“The worst outrages by the CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force) have been frequent gang rapes of all women in Muslim villages,followed by the execution of the men”.
(Eric Margolis,The Ottawa Citizen,December 8,1991)

“While army troops dragged men from their homes for questioning in the border town of Kunan Pushpura,scores of women say they were raped by soldiers….a pregnant Kashmiri woman,who was raped and kicked,gave birth to a son with a broken arm.”
(Melinda Liuin,Newsweek,June 24,1991)
[Anthony Wood and Ron MaCullagh of the Sundav Observer (June 02,1992) estimated that over 500 Indian army men were involved in this orgy of rape and plunder in Kunan Pushpura.]

“The security forces have entered hospitals,beaten patients,hit doctors,entered operating theaters,smashed instruments. Ambulances have been attacked,curfew passes are confiscated.”
(Asia Watch,May 1991)

“Subjugated,humiliated,tortured and killed by the 650,000-strong Indian army,the people of Kashmir have been living through sheer hell for more than a year,the result of an increasingly brutal campaign of state repression. India hides behind its carefully-crafted image of “non-violence”and presents itself in international forums as a model of democracy and Pluralism. Yet,it is unable to stand up the scrutiny of even its admirers. All journalists,especially television crews,were expelled from the Valley. With no intrusive cameras to record the brutalities of the Indian forces,the world has been kept largely in the dark.” (The Toronto Star,January 25,1991)

“Young girls were now being raped systematically by entire (Indian) army units rather than by a single soldier as before. Girls are taken to soldier’s camps and held naked in their tents for days on end. Many never return home….Women are strung up naked from trees and their breast lacerated with knives,as the (Indian) soldiers tell them that their breast will never give milk again to a newborn militant. Women are raped in front of their husbands and children,or paraded naked through villages and beaten on the breasts.”
(The Independent,September 18,1990)

Atrocities will further fuel Naxalism

Praful Bidwai

The killing of 20 civilians by the Central Reserve Police Force in Bijapur in Central India’s Chhattisgarh will go down as a black mark in the history of Indian counter -insurgency. All evidence suggests that the CRPF gravely mistook a village meeting to plan a seed festival for a Maoist gathering and indiscriminately fired on it.

Among the victims were two 15-year-old boys,a 12-year-old girl,and a professional drum player -hardly fit to be confused for armed Naxalites. Although the CRPF troops’bullet injuries remain unexplained,and four of those killed allegedly had police records,nothing suggests that Maoists ambushed the troops,who then fired in self-defence.

Even firing in self-defence cannot be indiscriminate. Besides,there’s evidence of sexual assault and mutilation of dead bodies. This suggests collective punishment -which is categorically unacceptable.

Equally deplorable is the butchery’s rationalisation that the CRPF has no “system of segregating”guerrillas from civilians during gunfights,and Chief Minister Raman Singh’s argument that Maoists use civilians as human shields,and are responsible for their deaths.

However,the present case appears less an instance of unintended damage than deliberate targeting. The attacking party followed the “fire-first-and-ask-questions-later”approach.

The incident emphasises the growing disconnect between the people and counterinsurgency troops,who have no comprehension of their language,culture and sensitivities,and whom they often consider inferior

In Chhattisgarh,Adivasi identities,rooted in an ancient civilisation,remain strong. It is only since the 1980s that they have been exposed to large-scale intrusion by external predatory interests like forest contractors and the mining mafia. The tribals have over the years lost land and access to forests.

The state fails to comprehend this as it pushes destructive mining and industrial projects,thus increasing the Adivasis’alienation. It hasn’t even invested a fraction of what it spends on the paramilitary forces in addressing Adivasi grievances or helping its counterinsurgency troops understand the roots of tribal alienation amidst which Maoism thrives.

E.N. Rammohan -a distinguished former Border Security Force chief with much counterinsurgency experience -puts his finger on the nub:”Give land to the tiller and forests back to the tribals. Plus,bring down the vast gap between the rich and the poor� and the Maoists would be on the wane.”

In Bijapur,the CRPF was in the first place wrong to open fire. The proper objective of a counterinsurgency operation is not to kill rebels,but to bring them to justice by establishing their culpability for specific crimes,and to isolate them politically from the population.

This civilian butchery has created fear and insecurity among the people. Many are planning to move out of their villages into neighbouring Andhra Pradesh. It will take generations for their scars to heal.

Politically,the incident is a huge victory for the Maoist argument that the Indian state is irredeemably anti-people and brutal. Democracy is a mere fa�ade. It must be overthrown through an armed revolution.

The only way to redeem this situation is to award exemplary punishment to those responsible for the killings. India has paid a heavy price for not bringing the culprits of past counterinsurgency excesses to book.

Take the Chittisingpura massacre of 2000,in which 36 Sikhs were killed. Indian military forces killed five innocent locals at Pathribal in Anantnag district,claiming they were the culprits. Their bodies were dressed up in military uniforms and set on fire in an extraordinarily shoddy cover-up attempt. Officers were decorated and monetarily rewarded for this heinous crime. They compounded their offence by substituting the victims’DNA samples with fake ones.

The incident still rankles in Kashmir. Yet,nobody has been put on trial for it -although the Supreme Court has strongly refuted the army’s misguided invocation of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act to reject that demand.

The latest Chhattisgarh killings raise serious questions about the anti-Maoist campaign underway in nine states. It has come in for scathing criticism from an Expert Group of the Planning Commission.

The Group holds:”The methods chosen by the government to deal with the Maoist phenomenon [have] increased the people’s distrust of the police and consequent unrest. Protest against police harassment is itself a major instance of unrest frequently leading to further violence by the police� which in effect triggers a second round of the spiral.”

In many parts of India,the state has been captured by the rich or become dysfunctional and predatory upon the people. Notes the Expert Group:”One of the attractions of the Naxalite movement is that it does provide protection to the weak against the powerful.. One doesn’t have to romanticise the Maoists to recognise this.

Green Hunt only pays lip service to the official “two-pronged”approach of “development”and “law-and-order,”or simultaneously redressing popular grievances and using force. In practice,it overwhelmingly relies on brute force without recognising that the insurgency feeds on Adivasi dispossession and brutalisation.

The official premise that Maoism is India’s “greatest internal security threat”is profoundly mistaken. The Maoists aren’t about to capture power or destroy India’s unity. They pose a civil law-and-order problem,which should be tackled by normal police methods -good intelligence-gathering,crime control,painstaking evidence collection,and prosecution of those instigating or practising violence.

By contrast,social cohesion is gravely threatened by the communal Right,including the Bharatiya Janata Party and its associates,some of whom have embraced terrorism,but against whom the Indian state doesn’t act.

The state must heed the counsel of counterinsurgency experts like Robert Thompson. “Hardly,if ever,has a counter-insurgency campaign been won strictly by waging war. Military action has an important role in overcoming guerrillas,but the philosophy espoused by the guerrillas must also be defeated and this requires a well-reasoned combination of political reform,civic action and education of the population.”

As Mr. Rammohan puts it,a counterinsurgency operation must be “scrupulously legal.”This is a precondition for its popular acceptance,and also for the state’s legitimacy. When will India’s rulers learn this?

Atrocities on Sikh Women in Punjab

“If any action occurs in this village,every single male is going to be taken out and shot. Then we’re going to take all the women to our camp and there we’re going to create a new breed for Punjab.”

Brig. RP Sinha addressing assembled Sikh villagers on March 8,1991,International Women’s Day

And this was the way International Women’s Day was celebrated in Punjab. The untold story of the Sikh Resistance Movement is the story of Sikh women. It is a feature of Punjabi culture that atrocities on women are rarely reported and remain hidden. Families feel ashamed to speak of the treatment women received at the hands of Indian Security Forces,but this story must be told.

Role of Sikh Women in the Movement

Many Sikh women participated in the Sikh resistance movement as fighters. Like their sisters from past ages,Sikh women joined their brothers in the fight for freedom. Many brave Singhnees fought side by side with their Singhs and attained Shaheedee. The examples of Shaheeds Bhai Harvinderjit Singh Taini Babbar and Bibi Manjeet Kaur Babbar (their story will be posted later),Bhai Pritpal Singh and Bibi Harjeet Kaur,etc,are notable.

Sikh women often worked as messengers for Sikh Resistance groups as well as preparing hideouts and serving tired Sikh fighters.

But unfortunately,many Sikh women were also the target of the bloody thirsty Indian Security forces. Sikh women were ruthlessly tortured,not only physically but also mentally. They were used as tools to force the surrender of Sikh fighters who were their relatives and also as a means of humiliating families. When Sikh women were arrested with their husbands,the husbands were often forced to watch the rape of their wives. Rape was used as an interrogation tool.

Humiliation:A common form of torture used on Sikhs

The Indian Forces also began a program of “shudhee karan”,which was a code name for the rape of Sikh women. They joked that the offspring of their rapes would change the genetic makeup of the Sikh community and they would kill the Resistance in this way. Many rape victims took their own lives,unable to live with the ongoing humiliation at the hands of the Indian police.

The first example of the atrocities heaped upon Sikh women is that of Bibi Amandeep Kaur.

Shaheed Bibi Amandeep Kaur

Bibi Amandeep Kaur

Bibi Amandeep Kaur was the sister of Bhai Harpinder Singh Goldy aka. Pamma of the Khalistan Commando Force. She was only twenty when she was arrested,tortured,raped and then killed by the Punjab Police.

Bibi Amandeep Kaur,before her Shaheedee was on the run but had the courage to tell her story to human rights workers.

Here is her story in her own words,shortly before she was murdered [I have divided the sections for easier reading]:

Marriage &Arrest

“Jaswinder Singh Sraa son of Surjeet Singh of Jassowal village Ludhiana dst. Was born and brought up on the UK. He presently lives in Mississauga Canada.

He came to India on October 12,1991 for marriage on October 24th. We along with my father Jaswant Sngh,village Headman Bhag Singh and Member of Panchyaat Meet Singh went to the office of the sub-registrar,Rampura Phul,for registration of the marriage. As we came out of the courtroom,the SHO of Phul,picked up three of us,me,my husband and my father. We were taken to Phul Police Station where SSP Kahlon,SP Mohkam Singh,DSP Aulah and SP of Operations were present.

Inhuman Torture

The SSP on seeing us,promptly ordered that my two male relations be stripped naked in my presence. He then took out the picture of his slain son and addressing them remarked that he had taken the revenge for the murder (by dishonouring me,the sister of an underground Sikh activist).

Kahlon then started abusing my husband and father. He took hold of a lathi to beat the two. It was then the turn of his subordinates who beat us with their leather belts. The SSP ordered that my husband and father slap each other.

After this cruel exercise,we were blindfolded. I was relieved of my two wedding rings,a pair of ear-rings and one golden chain. From my husband,the SSP snatched $500 and a bracelet of 3.5 tolas and his wedding ring. My father was similarly robbed of Rs. 2500. I and my husband were put into our van PCL-8433. We heard the SSP directing his staff to set our house on fire and bring the wife and younger daughter of Jaswant Singh (my mother and sister) to the police station for similar treatment.

After Kahlon left,we were brought back to the police station. While my husband and father were put in the lock-up,I was kept out for maltreatment [i.e. for sexual assault].

Early next morning we three were taken to Sardulgarh by our van. On October 27,my mother Surjeet Kaur was brought to us. She told us her story of dishonour [rape],torture and maltreatment. She was kept in a Rampura police station and at the head office of CIA Bathinda.

In our absence,the police from Rampura Phul ransacked our house and removed all our belongings. The village panchayat was not let anywhere near the house. No seizure report was prepared and handed over to the panchayat or anyone else.

12 Days of Terror

I,my mother and father were kept in Sardulgarh police station for 12 days. But my husband was moved to Phul police station on October 29. The SSP was present there. He ordered my husband’s release on October 30,telling him to forget about his marriage to me and leave India immediately,which he did the next day. In the meantime,the village panchayat came to know of our detention at Sardulgarh and they came there to rescue us but we were removed stealthily to Boha police station.

At Boha,I was not given even water for washing under SSP’s order. We were maltreated there [the woman was reluctant to give details of the mistreatment].

After eight days,the three of us were removed from Boha to CIA Bathinda. My mother and I were released from three weeks of illegal detention. My father was kept in CIA Bathinda and at Phul and was produced in a court on November 30. A case was registered against him.

KP Gill ‘Helpless’

While we were in custody,Jaswinder Singh,who happens to be brother of my father,telephoned DGP KP Gill at telephone No. 753-546840 requesting him to intervene but Gill told him that Kahlon did not listen to his advice.

We have learnt that the SSP had picked us up because on October 23,1991,some millitants had abducted six traders of Phul and the police suspected my 16-year-old brother Harpinder Singh Goldy aka. Pamma’s hand in the abduction. My brother had gone underground in the wake of police harassment in August 1991 when he was studying in class 10 + 1 .

I have gone underground to escape further humiliation and torture because the SSP Harkishan Kahlon is after me,for unknown reasons. Because of the “treatment”given to my husband,he has left me and does not wish to keep me as his wife any longer.”

Shaheedee

Bibi Amandeep Kaur stayed in hiding until January 21 1992. The police then played a sinister game. They asked he to return to her house,returning all her property and insisted they would not harass her any more. They also bailed her father the day before. Jaswant Singh did not trust the police so he did not return home. Amandeep Kaur did. When her mother was out,two gun men with masked faces came on behalf of SSP Bathinda,Kahlon,and shot Bibi Amandeep Kaur dead on January 21st at 7:30pm.

Bhai Harpinder Singh Gold,brother of Bibi Amandeep Kaur,at age 18,also later sacrificed his life for the cause of Sikh freedom.

The Story of Bibi Gurmeet Kaur

Bibi Gurmeet Kaur was a student of the 10 grade at village Lehrkaa near Kathoo Nangal. Bibi Gurmeet Kaur and her older sister Bibi Parmjeet Kaur had gone to visit their father Swarn Singh and brother Satnam Singh who were in prison for giving shelter to Sikh Resistance fighters. They had returned home on April 21,1989 when the Indian police raided their home and arrested Bibi Parmjeet Kaur. The police told villagers that the Deputy Commissioner wanted to record her statement. Parmjeet Kaur was kept in custody one night and then returned home. Next Gurmeet Kaur was arrested and kept for two nights. She too was released but threatened with dire circumstances if she told what had happened to her. Gurmeet Kaur did not remain silent and recounted what had happened to her.

When Gurmeet Kaur was brought to the police station,she was stripped naked and tortured in the verandah of the police station in plain view of all the police officers. That night,the police blindfolded her and locked her in a room. In that room,drunken Indian Police officers took turns raping her. Gurmeet Kaur fell unconscious and when she woke the next morning,she found herself covered in blood and stark naked.

The next day,Gurmeet Kaur was tortured again. The perverse and twisted police officers went so far as to put salt and chili peppers into Gurmeet Kaur’s private parts.

On April 24,when Gurmeet Kaur was released,she could not walk. She was taken to hospital for treatment by the villagers.

Other Cases

These cases are not unique. Gang Rapes and humiliation were common in Punjab. 19 year old Baljeet Kaur,sister of Sikh fighter Bhai Gurjeet Singh was also gang raped. Bibi Rachhpal Kaur was arrested for no reason but for having caught the eye of the police party and On September 5,1989 was gang raped by the Kali Das Sharma and other police officers.

The story of the treatment of Sikh women at the hands of Indian Security Forces is a long and sad one. I don’t know which cases to highlight and which to leave. Should I write about Sarbjit Kaur (14) and Salwinder Kaur (13) who were abducted while collecting clay for a school project and then gang raped and killed by Indian Police? Or should I write about the seven-year-old daughter of a Singh who was molested and then dismembered by the Police’s Poohla Nang? The list is endless.

The abuse of Sikh women was and is widespread in Punjab. Mothers,wives and children of Sikh fighters were considered legitimate targets. The butchers who were responsible for these tragedies are still in the police force today. They are now high ranking officers. And the abuse continues…

“Now Get Your Khalistan…”

Victim of Police Torture

Bhai Nirvair Singh was the Granthi of Gurdwara Shaheedaa(n),Amritsar. Bhai Nirvair Singh’s younger brother,Bhai Kulwant Singh was a Sikh Resistance Fighter and the police constantly raided their home in search of him. Finally,unable to locate Kulwant Singh,SSP Azhar Alam and his “Black Cats” shot Bhai Nirvair Singh to death. Bhai Nirvair Singh’s wife,Bibi Manjit Kaur,was with him at the time and ran to save herself. The police caught Bibi Manjit Kaur and badly beat her with their rifle butts. They let her live,but her ordeal was far from over.

On May 5,1988,the police again raided the house. Bhai Nirvair Singh’s youngest brother,Bhai Dilbagh Singh,a Granthi at Gurdwara Baba Bakala,was home but hid himself,fearing for his life. The police spotted him and without any warning,shot him dead. Bibi Manjit Kaur was still in the house when the police entered and they immediately began to beat her. They grabbed her by her hair and dragged her to the fields where the Indian Police tortured her for an hour and a half. When Bibi Manjit Kaur was almost senseless,they threw her on top of Bhai Dilbagh Singh’s dead body and laughed,”Now get your Khalistan…”. Bibi Manjit Kaur’s feet were so swollen from the torture that she could not walk for days. Her scalp also oozed blood from the repeated blows. Villagers who were witness to this scene were also beaten and told to keep their mouths shut. Harassment of their family and relatives continued.

Azhar Alam

Today,Azhar Alam is a high ranking official in the Vigilance Bureau of the Punjab Police. The man responsible for the brutal torture of thousands of innocent Sikh men and women has not been charged with any crime.

Bibi Gurdev Kaur &Bibi Gurmeet Kaur

Perhaps the most brutal of all Indian Police officials in Punjab was Batala’s Gobind Ram. Gobind Ram took sadistic pleasure in personally torturing Sikh prisoners and kept a vat filled with feces and urine that he force-fed to amritdhari Sikhs while saying,”You have drunk the amrit of Gobind Singh,now drink the amrit of Gobind Ram.”

Gobind Ram’s atrocities came to light nationwide when he ordered the arrest of Bibi Gurdev Kaur (wife of Bhai Kulwant Singh Babbar) and Bibi Gurmeet Kaur (wife of Bhai Mehal Singh). Both Singhs were underground at the time.

On August 21,1989,a van with tinted windows came and parked in front of the Parbhat Finance Company,Amritsar,where both Singhnees worked. Six armed men got out of the van and approached Bibi Gurmeet Kaur and Bibi Gurdev Kaur,ordering them to get in the van. When the Bibis demanded to know who they were,one man identified himself as Lakhwinder Lakha,ASI. He said that the police party had come from Batala Sadr police station and they would have to come with him. When the Singhnees began to make a scene,the police threw them into the van. Bibi Gurmeet Kaur and Bibi Gurdev Kaur’s dastaars were ripped off and used to tie their arms and their kirpans were also taken off.

The van arrived at the notorious Beco Torture Centre in Batala at 7pm. When the Singhnees went inside,they saw SSP Gobind Ram beating a Sikh youth with a rod. When he saw the two women enter,he immediately came towards them and hit Gurdev Kaur in the stomach with his rod. Bibi Gurdev Kaur collapsed onto the ground and began to bleed from her private parts. The bleeding did not stop for several days. Gobind Ram kept hitting Bibi Gurdev Kaur in the stomach without saying a word for five minutes. He then gave the rod to another Inspector whom he ordered to hit Bibi Gurdev Kaur in the joints.

Gobind Ram next moved to Bibi Gurmeet Kaur whom he threw to the ground and began to kick in the chest. The next torture to begin was the “ghotna” where a heavy log is rolled on the thighs with men standing on top,which results in ripped muscles. In Bibi Gurdev Kaur’s own words,”Then they put a heavy roller on my thighs and made a few policemen stand on it,while others rotated it. I kept on screaming but they hit me with belts and kept on asking me the whereabouts of my husband Kulwant Singh.”

Both women were severely tortured for two days. Gobind Ram kept demanding to know where Bhai Kulwant Singh and Bhai Mehal Singh were. The Bibis kept repeating that they did not know,but Gobind Ram was not satisfied. They were tortured until they fell unconscious. They were then revived and tortured again.

When Bibi Gurdev Kaur was nearing her death,the police secretly took her to the government hospital and left her there. Gurmeet Kaur’s right leg was paralysed and both Singhnees had been kept awake since their arrest. Someone was called from the outside to massage their limbs so they could regain some sensation again. Both women could not walk but were forced to do so. In the hospital,a merciful lady doctor took care of Gurdev Kaur and also informed her family.

News of all this reached the media and all political religious and social organizations condemned Gobind Ram’s actions. When finally Gurmeet Kaur refused to hand over any Singh,she was threatened with being killed. By now though,because the press had gotten wind of the arrest,she was indicted in a false case and sent to jail. After some time,she too was released.

Because Bibi Gurdev Kaur received the best care possible,she was saved from death,but for the rest of her life she would face health problems.

Human Rights organizations condemned Gobind Ram for his brutal treatment of these two women. He claimed that no torture had occurred and both were kept in a “Guest House”. KP Gill,the Director General of Punjab Police announced,”the reports against SSP Batala,Gobind Ram by members of Panchyats and Sarpanches (community leaders) were false. There is no truth in them. This was propoganda against the police officers. This was verified after investigations. There were such reports against other honest and hardworking police officers [as well]“

When no action was taken against Gobind Ram,and he continued to torture and maim at will,the Singhs took it upon themselves to finish this rabid dog. Gobind Ram was killed on January 10,1990 in a massive bombing.

KP Gill:Super Cop or Sexual Predator?

KP Gill

KP Gill,ex-Director General of Punjab Police,is thought to have single handedly crushed the Khalistan movement in Punjab. He has been given the title of “Super Cop” by Indian media despite having unleashed a wave of terror on the Sikhs that was not even seen in the days of the Mughals. Torture methods were so grotesque and brutal that they cannot be described.

Gill was known to the Sikhs of Punjab as a drunk who also preyed on helpless women. Although Gill is proclaimed “Super Cop” in India and considered a great hero,the fact that he has been convicted for sexual assault is usually ignored.

In 1988,KP Gill was attending a party to celebrate Operation Black Thunder (an assault on Sree Darbaar Sahib Amrtisar). At this party,in plain view of all attendees,KP Gill sexually assaulted Indian Administrative Service officer Rupen Deol Bajaj. Bajaj was not helpless like most victims and instead of forgetting the incident,filed a police report.

Other officals spoke with Bajaj and asked her to withdraw the case since Gill was a hero in the fight against the Sikh Resistance but despite all this,she persisted. According to one report,”The government immediately took sides and tried to squelch or delay the court case. It also took petty action against Ms. Bajaj by making her a low-ranking official,stopping her mail,taking her off of mailing lists,removing her from government telephone books,etc”

Finally,in 1996,the butcher of Punjab,KP Gill was convicted of sexual assault. Though he was initially sentenced to three months in prison,the sentence was reduced to three years supervised probation (later further reduced to one year,un-supervised probation). He was also ordered to pay Rupen Deol Bajaj Rs. 2 lakh and pay Rs. 50 000 in legal expenses.

If a high ranking officer could not escape being a victim of Gill’s lust,what to say of the thousands of poor Sikh women kept in dark cells without any charges and without any rights? This is the character of India’s hero,KP Gill,”Super Cop”

And The Abuse Continues Today…

Some argue that in the turmoil of Punjab,perhaps some excesses were committed but times have changed. The Police have reformed and India now treats Sikhs fairly. A glance at the newspapers is enough to dispel that belief. The following story appeared in the Chandigarh Tribune on September 27,2003 http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030927/chd.htm

____________

Woman alleges inhuman torture by police

Our Correspondent

Karamjit Kaur shows injury marks on her leg. – Tribune photo by Pankaj Sharma

Chandigarh,September 26

An another incident of brutal torture came to light when a 20-year-old girl,Karamjit Kaur,who was rescued by the Warrant Officer of the Punjab and Haryana High Court,today alleged that she was subjected to inhuman treatment and was asked to remove her clothes by the Punjab Police personnel at a press conference organised by the NGO Lawyers for Human Rights International here today.

“Five persons including two women,who had been allegedly subjected to third degree torture for several days by the Punjab Police were rescued by the Warrant Officer of the Punjab and Haryana High Court yesterday. These five persons were suspected to be involved in a murder case by the police. The five persons who were released included – Karamjit Kaur,Tirath Kaur,Sahib Singh,Gurdev Singh and Gurmit Singh,” informed Mr Arunjeev Singh Walia,Press Secretary.

Showing torture marks on her body,the victim while addressing scribes,said she was detained at Nabha police station for several days and been tortured. She was even ordered to remove her clothes by police constables,the victim alleged.

Narrating her tale of woe,she said police constables,after taking liquor usually interrogated her in the midnight. Even if a woman constable was called most of the time she stayed outside the room during her interrogation. The victim further added that:”I can not reveal the details whatever happened to me was worse than a hell.”

She further added that “she was subjected to inhuman third degree torture twice by pulling her legs apart in 180 degree and also beaten up with an iron rod in between her legs and two police men putting pressure on that rod.

“I was also threatened of liquidation if I did not disclose the truth and was also molested by the policemen”,the victim further said. Similarly,her mother said:”It was difficult to see my husband,son and daughter to be subjected to third degree torture by the police.”

When contacted the SHO of the police station concerned denied that they were subjected to third degrees torture. He said that all five of them were called at police station only for a day. Thereafter they were not traceable.
The General Secretary of the NGO,Mr Navkiran Singh,who had moved a petition in the high court for the release of victims said a Warrant Officer had secured the release five victims from the illegal custody of police station Kotwali,Nabha,Patiala district on September 25. He also informed that the high court had also ordered the medical examination of the victims. The Chairman of the NGO,Mr Amar Singh Chahal,demanded a CBI inquiry into the case.

_______________

How many cases continue to go unreported?

The Khalsa once saved thousands of abducted Hindu women from being molested and sold by the Afghans. Why can’t we even save our own now? Our sisters continue to suffer in Punjab. And the Panth continues its long slumber…

A discussion on the atrocities Sikh women suffered in Punjab would not be complete without a discussion on what Sikh widows and their children continue to endure today. They have been forgotten by most in the Panth. Those Singhs that sacrificed their lives for the Sikh Cause must have thought that the Panth would take care of their families after they had been martyred. Sadly,this has not happened. And now,many say that no future generation will be willing to make the same sacrifices seeing the way families that were left behind in this chapter of the Sikh struggle continue to be neglected and live in poverty.

15-Year-Old Harpreet Kaur

By mid-1992,the Indian Police in Punjab had lost all sense of morality and considered human rights to be a joke. On June 25,1992,15-year-old Harpreet Kaur RaNo was stopped while riding her bicycle in Amritsar’s Ghio Mandi.

Harpreet Kaur was very interested in the Sikh struggle and used to consider the Sikh fighters her brothers. When the newspaper would print a notice about the Shahidi and bhog of a Sikh fighter,she would cut out their picture and keep it in her purse.

The police decided to search her purse. When the pictures were found,the excuse to arrest this young Sikh girl was found and she was taken directly to the famous torture center at BR Model School in Amritsar. She was put in the custody of Thanedar Darshan Lal who punished Harpreet Kaur for her “crime”. In that dark torture center,only Vahiguru knows what suffering and brutality Harpreet Kaur faced.

Despite her family’s best efforts to free her,the newspapers reported that Harpreet Kaur along with 3 other “terrorists” had been killed on June 27,1992 near Sultanvind. Her body was not given to the family. The family went to the cremation grounds at Durgiana Mandir and in one pile of ashes,Harpreet Kaur’s sister recognized a kaRa. The two sisters used to wear identical KaRas and the ashes were recognized as Harpreet Kaur’s. No justice was ever expected or delivered for this cold-blooded murder.

Final Wish…

Bibi Kulbir Kaur Dhami

Bibi Kulbir Kaur Dhami was kept in illegal custody by the Tarn Taran CIA staff for many months from 1993 to 1994. Miraculously,she survived. During that time she saw countless Singhs and Singhnees be tortured and then killed in fake encounters. In her own words,Bibi Kulbir Kaur recounts the final wish of one Bibi who was being taken to her death:

“Surinder Kaur was the principal of a Model School in Tarn Taran. Her school had approximately 400 children enrolled. Her husband was a former soldier and worked in a bank in Amritsar. It was perhaps July 1993 when he was arrested along with his wife and children and brought to the jail for having given shelter [to Sikh fighters]. With her was the son of a Pandit,Ramesh,who had become a Singh and had been arrested with his group [of fighters]. This group was tortured in front of us. They endured this cruelty for about a week and most of the group confessed to having participated in some actions,but this couple,[Bibi Surinder Kaur and her husband] were accused of having given the group shelter only.

Surinder Kaur kept begging that her body not be touched by any male police officer. She was kept with me for eight days in the women’s lockup. In front of me,she was interrogated four times a day. The male police officers would beat her with sticks and use the ghotna. Three or four policemen would stand on the ghotna. I myself saw them drag her around by the chest. This entire interrogation was conducted by SP Operation Khoobi Ram,DSP Gurmit Singh,Inspetor Ram Nath,and SI Tarlochan Singh. They are completely responsible for torturing and killing her (it’s another story that their orders were all coming from the top).

Four members of this group,along with Surinder Kaur’s husband were tortured for a week and then killed in a fake encounter which was reported to then newspapers. One of those was a police officer,Dalbir Singh,who had abandoned his job,but he was apparently spared. All this [the encounter] happened in front of him and he could be a witness.

At around 8pm,the police took Surinder Kaur away from me while beating her. Surinder Kaur was dragged away as she wept and called out my name. They threw her in a car. She was sobbing and screaming her final wish to me,”You have to take care of my child now…look after him…this is your responsibility now.” Surinder Kaur was killed that night. The police officials told me that she cried the entire time in the car and they told her to do paath after which they shot her. When she died,Surinder Kaur was wearing my suit and the police officials teased me that because my suit had gone in my place,I had been spared.”

Bibi Kulbir Kaur Dhami now runs the Gur Asra Trust for Sikh orphans in Mohali.

Widow of a “Terrorist”

The widows of Sikh “terrorists” have suffered terribly in the years since 1993. Widows like 18-year old Jasvir Kaur,who had been married to Sukhdev Singh Sukha of Babbar Khalsa International were forced by their poverty to marry much older men. Many began to do menial work to make ends meet.

The following interview appeared in “The Week”,a well known Indian Magazine on April 19,1998. Bibi Jasmeet Kaur is a Sikh hero. She was married to Bhai Satnam Singh Chheena of the Bhindranvala Tiger Force and was involved in the punishing of Comrade Hardev,a depraved police tout who was known to rape and kill with impunity.

Bhai Satnam Singh Chheena

INTERVIEW:JASMEET KAUR,WIDOW OF A TERRORIST

‘We feel abandoned by the community’

Jasmeet Kaur was widowed two years after she married Satnam Singh Chheena of the Bhindranwale Tigers Force of Khalistan in 1991. She lived underground for years,bore his two children while in hiding and is being tried in murder case. She is active in the Gur Aasra project. Excerpts from an interview:

How have people treated the families of militants after terrorism ended?

People started looking at us with suspicion and hatred. They blamed the terrorists and their families for the harassment by the police. They felt we women could have corrected our husbands. The behaviour of the in-laws was the worst. My parents cooperated with me. So I didn’t have many problems. Yes,I had financial difficulties,and worked for the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee. I did feel orphaned,worried and insecure.

Do you wish the bloody years had not happened?

I cannot regret those years. What has happened cannot be wished away. Today,I have two sons,six and five years. It is difficult to raise them alone. I would prefer not to discuss their whereabouts.

Does being the sons of Chheena affect them?

I have not told them anything. When they ask me,I tell them their father is in the village. How do I explain things to them? My children don’t know that their father was a militant though they know his real name. I don’t want them to know about him now. I just want them to become responsible citizens and that the society gives them the same respect and dignity as others get.

Any Akali faction with you?

No one is with us now,not even (Simranjeet Singh) Mann. He probably feels that if he speaks up for us,he will never win an election. It is a matter of politics. We do feel abandoned by the community.

How was the scene when your husband was around?

When the movement was on,we were all respected,especially if our intentions were clear. I was a proclaimed offender (PO) even before I got married. While in Khalsa College,Amritsar,I was annoyed at the attack on the Golden Temple. My links with the militant movement grew as did my desire for revenge. I was in the AISSF and then with the BTFK. I was involved in the murder of Comrade Hardev Singh,and was in jail for a year,in Amritsar. After marriage I became PO again and was arrested and later bailed out. In 1995,I was arrested in Gurdaspur,where there was a case against me. The police would have hounded every family I stayed with. So till January 1996 I was in jail and when I was released,I decided not to be a PO because I had children to raise. I decided to attend the court hearings and to work. I can’t say I returned to the mainstream,but can’t even say I have given up the movement…that is in my blood by now. It is another matter that I have decided not to lift a gun,but will fight politically. Now this itself is a fight to collect all these people under one roof. People ask us why we are here,and we tell them. That is also part of the fight.

What problems did you face in raising your sons?

It was very difficult to get birth certificates for my children. All of us women underground used to get admitted under fake names in hospitals. But I arranged it somehow. I cannot count how many children were born underground,but many were. Kulbir Kaur Dhami’s child was born in the jail. We also did not not tell the schools that the child’s father was a terrorist?

Any emotional disturbances among the children?

Plenty. Call any child and discuss it,and we will have a tough time consoling them. These kids have seen their fathers being dragged away by the hair. They often get up in the middle of their sleep,screaming “hai mere pappa ko maar diya”. They are all small kids who have seen raw violence. So we try not to remind them of it. Most of the small children have not been told that their fathers are dead. Now some of the older ones are learning from their elders. We cannot hide it for all times. They miss their fathers,but they are not old enough to realise that. They don’t know of terrorists. The elder ones have some idea,which they don’t want to talk about. Even if we want to talk to them,explain and correct the picture,they say that we are wrong…that they have seen their fathers fighting for dharam. Why then should we create a bad picture of our husbands in their minds?

Do the children know about Khalistan,what it was all about?

No. We will tell them clearly what it was all about when they grow up. If we tell them now,we don’t know how it will affect them. We want them to be involved in constructive work so that they forget their old trauma. We want them to study,play and be happy.

What Can You Do?

The Sikh widows and children left behind need us. The Singhs that died did their part and it’s now up to us to do ours. We must make sure that those left behind are not suffering and living in poverty.

The best thing we can do is to visit these families and help them in the way they need it most. Establishing contact with them directly.

If you don’t know of any way to do this,helping institutions that support these families is also a good option. Two institutions that are doing this are the Dharam Singh Khalsa Trust and GurAsra Trust. Their links are http://www.khalsatrust.com/ and http://www.guraasra.com or http://www.guraasra.org/ . Please support them in their mission.

Our Brothers and sisters need us now. We have let them down for much too long as it is.

BREAKING:New proof shows that High Ranking Sikh Army Officers were killed in 1984 Sikh Genocide

BREAKING:New proof shows that High Ranking Sikh Army Officers were killed in 1984 Sikh Genocide

Chandigarh:December 17,2012

All India Sikhs Students Federation (AISSF) and “Sikhs for Justice” (SFJ) has unearthed the “Murder Fields” at Tughlakabad and Nangloi where dozens of Sikhs belonging to Armed Forces were butchered to death during November 1984. The high Ranking officers &junior Ranks those who fell victims to the mayhem unleashed against serving Sikh defence personnel at Tughlakabad and Nangloi Railways Stations is a National Shame say the organizations.

AISSF,SFJ And All India Defence Brotherhood (Punjab) released the services particulars and other relevant details of the armed forces personnel killed in November 1984 at death traps laid at Tughlakabad and Nangloi. The documents obtained by AISSF reveals a single FIR Number 355 dated November 1,1984 lodged under sections 147,148,201,302,and 295 of the IPC lodged with Government Railway Police (GRP) Delhi. The Railway Protection Force (RPF) responsible for law and order at the Railway property not only failed to protect these Sikh Army Officers,but rather it is believed their weapons were instead used to kill the Sikh victims at Tughlakabad and Nangloi Railway Stations.

Pointing to the criminal silence by the Armed Forces for the past 28 years over the murder of its high ranking officers,AISSF President &Brigadier Kahlon have demanded the Ministry of Defence take immediate action in the prosecution of the culprits an leaders which masterminded the planned slaughter of Sikh army men during November 1984.

Brigadier Kahlon while speaking at a Press Conference stated that the Defence community in particular and the country as a whole would like to know from the Chiefs of Army Navy and Air Force what action was taken in response to these killings and what will now be done as a result of the revelation of these brutal killings of its own members,with use of their own weaponry and men.

Brigadier kahlon and other leaders have also demanded an immediate constitution of judicial commission so that the truth may come out and action be taken against the butchers involved in the killing as serving members of the the national army and armed forces.

AISSF has demanded a debate in the Parliament to determine why the slaughters broad day light of the nations defenders were completely ignored and no action has ever been taken against the perpetrators. The ruthless murder of high ranking Sikh Army Officers at Tughlakabad and Nangloi in the presence of Railway Police during November 1984 also proves the connivance of police and entire administration of the country in genocidal attacks on Sikhs stated Peer Mohammad.

Amongst those killed in the Massacres killed:

  • Lt. Col. A.S. Anand (74 ArmouredRegiment),
  • Major Sukhwinder Singh (150 Field Regiment),
  • Captain IPS Bindra (63 Cavalry),
  • Captain UPSJassal (9 Assam Battalion),
  • Captain Partap Singh (Ordinance Corps),
  • Lieutenant SS Gill (89 ArmouredRegiment)
  • Flight Lieutenant Harinder Singh,

The press conference held by SFJ and AISSF was attended

  • Lef.. J. Kartar Singh Gill,
  • Brigadier HarwantSingh National President AIDB ,
  • Brigadier Navab Singh,Major S.S. Dhillon,
  • Major Karnail Singh ,
  • Suba Singh Hony F/O Harcharan Singh Gill ,
  • Hony F/O Mamohan Singh All Retd.

USURPING OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN IHK

November 19, 2012

Spearhead Research

During October 2012 two reports were released pertaining human rights situation in the IHK. Reports by Amnesty International (AI) and Citizen’s Council for Justice (CCJ) were released in a quick succession. Both dossiers have adequately exposed the ongoing Human Rights (HR) violations in IHK.

Indian Independence Act had laid down clear terms of reference for the rulers of princely states. They were given the choice to freely accede to either India or Pakistan, or to remain independent. Both these factors were ignored in the case of Kashmir.

Ever since the landing of Indian troops in Kashmir, on 27 October, 1947, HR violations by the Indian Law Enforcing Agencies (LEAs) and Security Forces continue with impunity. Public Safety Act (PSA) empowers the State authorities to detain any individual in IHK on the charges of acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of law and order. Under section 8 of this act, a Divisional Commissioner or a District Magistrate may issue a detention order to prevent any person from acting in a manner prejudicial to the “security of the State or the maintenance of public order”. Vague wording of the statute provides an umbrella cover to the atrocities of LEAs.

Read more…


Plunder of India

May 11, 2011

Unknown to the world – and especially to Indians – Indian ‘citizens’ have approximately 1.4 TRILLION US dollars stashed away in foreign accounts. Wikileaks just exposed the ones in Swiss banks.

The fact remains that India suffers from the most corrupt, nepotistic and money-hungry administration ever seen in its history. The fact that Manmohan Singh jee was responsible for ending the license raj and removing bureaucratic red tape in India’s economy is being used to the hilt by Congress and its favourites. India also “lost” 462 billion US dollars, but India’s politicians and businessmen believe that India and its poor can tolerate such a loss if it benefits the rich.

India’s corruption perception index is 3.3, and India ranks number 87 in the list, showing how the people are aware of rampant corruption and that common public and political perceptions are cognizant of corrup activities, regardless of the INC or BJP being in power.

All hopes are vested with Anna Hazare and his embryonic movement, so that India’s growth and development can finally trickle down to the poorer masses who have suffered for too long.

Plunder of India.pdf
ZoneAsia-Pk


Don’t push us too far on Kashmir, its ours: Pakistan warned US

September 14, 2010

US had asked Pakistan in 2002 to end infiltration across the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir but was instead told not to “push it too far” on the issue with an assertion that “Kashmir should have been ours”, according to declassified documents. This communication forms part of a meeting Richard Haass, the then Director of Policy Planning Staff at the US State Department, had with an unnamed Pakistani military official on October 31, 2002 to discuss US-Pak cooperation a year after the deadly 9/11 attacks in the US.

“On Kashmir, Haass stressed the importance of ending infiltration, but the Pak official warned the US not to push Pakistan too far on Kashmir,” classified documents released on Monday said.

According to the document, Haass told the top official that he was pleased about the (Indian) announcement of troop pullback from the border as de-escalation would free resources to be devoted to sealing the Afghan border and counter-terrorism.

“It appeared that India wanted to renew contacts but continued infiltration was a barrier to progress,” Haass said.

“The US believed that infiltration was continuing. Stopping it would help Pakistan’s cause with the US and India. Infiltration hurts Pakistan’s friends efforts to help it,” he said, according to the documents.

The Pakistan official agreed that Kashmir was the issue “bedevilling our relations”. But Pakistan’s Kashmir position was “based on justice”, he argued.

“Kashmir should have been ours. The Pakistani people would not agree to make the LOC (Line of Control) the international border. Kashmir had cost Musharraf a lot, as had his decision to help the CT coalition.

“Musharraf’s detractors had hit him on both Kashmir and Afghanistan. India had tried to exploit the political atmosphere after 9/11,” the Pak official said.

“Haass relied that he perceived an opportunity to improve the situation in and surrounding Kashmir. India seemed to realize that lack of political and economic opportunity and abuse of human rights created support for insurgency and a better context for diplomacy was now being created.

“Haas said that both improved governance and diplomacy were key to moving forward on Kashmir,” the documents said.

At the same meeting, Pakistan pleaded with the US to provide it with an aerial surveillance capability.

Pakistan would have no objection to the same capability being provided to India, the Pakistani official said and proposed that it might be an excellent confidence building measure, as if the two sides could see what was happening across the border to reduce the possibility of misconstruing what the other side was doing, the documents said.


Let’s move on, Mr Singh

September 14, 2010

The News International

The mood in India after the Mumbai attacks was ugly. All India had to offer was revenge. One recalls being confused that official India, not the Indian herd, was acting in the manner that it was. Its stance was so naïve, so self-defeating, so Americanesque that one actually began to fret, much as one does here at the utterances of our leaders.

Why was Manmohan Singh acting so? Did he not understand that Mumbai was a terrorist ploy to keep India and Pakistan at daggers drawn and wreck years of painstakingly constructed agreements emerging from the Composite Dialogue. Or was he, like his best friend Bush, also someone who speaks a moment or so before he thinks? And was he so weak, so much a populist, so given to bending with the wind, that he would rather wager war than risk unpopularity for the sake of preserving peace? We have the answer to that question from Mr Manmohan Singh himself.

After Mumbai Indian public opinion demanded that Pakistan be held to account. India had hoped that this would give it leverage to coerce Pakistan into paying greater attention to India’s concerns, but unfortunately that had not happened; the results were not as expected. That is why, at Thiumphu, his effort was to find ways and means of getting the two countries once again back on the path of a dialogue: “If we don’t want to go to war, then engagement and dialogue are the only way forward,” as he told Indian newspaper editors on Sept 7. Welcome aboard, Mr Singh; you have got it right, finally.

If Mr Singh cares to recall, this is what some of us had said would occur. As for the Indian herd, namely the public and their opinion, Disraeli said there is no such thing as “public opinion,” there is only “public sentiment.” Besides, one knows how this sentiment is formed. It is a brew of folly, weakness, prejudice, wrong feeling, right feeling, obstinacy, sound bites, headlines and newspaper paragraphs. As a politician Mr Singh must no doubt bear public opinion in mind for the next election, but as a statesman he must think of the next generation. Hence, he should not let truth go a-begging. He should tell his compatriots that nations do not make peace with friends but rather with unsavoury enemies, like Pakistan, and persuade them to let him work at it. It appears that he may be getting around to doing so. He therefore deserves support.

In case Mr Singh fears for the future, so do we; because the closer India and Pakistan get to cobbling peace the greater the prospect-nay, certainty-of another terrorist attack on India emanating possibly from Pakistan soil or with Pakistani connections. Hence, when that happens, despite all our precautions, Mr Singh should not go tub-thumping and making menacing gestures, and accuse Pakistan of promoting it; or queer the pitch for negotiations once again. We need to get a grip on the terrorist monster more than India does. By helping Pakistan Mr Singh will be helping India. Threaten Pakistan, and Osama bin Laden, if dead, will be smiling in his grave; attack Pakistan and bin Laden, if alive, will be doing a jig around his dialysis machine.

Mr Singh should now proceed with alacrity because he has wasted enough time to:

- Announce that India is now ready to resume the Composite Dialogue where it was broken off; offer to conclude the agreement on Sir Creek that has been finalised, and remove the persisting small difference on Siachin.

- Announce, further, that he will be sending/allowing Indian officials to testify against those arrested and now on trial in Pakistan for complicity in the Mumbai attacks in the hope of securing their conviction and not to let the guilty off merely on account of non-fulfilment of procedural requirements.

- Understand that while he can deal with the Naxalites as he wishes, when it comes to Kashmir he cannot, at least not without enraging us across the Line of Control. Mr Singh should deal with the Kashmiri leadership; and to understand how they define Azadi and to see if there can be a meeting of minds. It is true Pakistan cannot wrest Kashmir by force from India. But is it not equally true that India cannot retain Kashmir by force and expect that India’s image and peace of mind will not suffer the consequences, to say nothing of its security?

- Be prepared to address Pakistan’s reasonable military concerns, and specifically what meaningful measures could be taken that would lessen the threat of an armed Indian incursion into Pakistan. India will not need to disarm to appear accommodating because there are many ways of skinning this cat. And, of course, to abandon Cold Start, a pernicious doctrine that has triggered endless preparations for a hot response.

- Finally, offer to revisit the Indus Waters Treaty to take into account Pakistan’s concerns. Eventually this treaty will have to be revised. Climate change, rather than any other factor, has made this obvious.

Such steps and/or others similar in nature would have a huge impact on the atmospherics. They will lend efforts for peace considerable momentum. They would also put Pakistan under considerable pressure to respond. They would strengthen the hands of those here who believe that an equable relationship with India is not only possible but essential. If then Mr Singh truly desires peace, as many feel that he does, he should not follow a path that makes it impossible.

Needless to say hurdles will arise and on occasions despair may result. That is in the very nature of India-Pakistan negotiations. Often we are our own worst enemies. However, that is not reason enough to give up. Moreover, his having been instrumental in righting India’s economic policies, what would be a more fitting legacy for Mr Singh than to complete a distinguished period in public life by aligning India’s relations with Pakistan in a manner that the single-biggest threat to India’s security and steady economic growth is diminished, if not entirely removed.

Go for it, Mr Singh; you have cogitated long enough. The globe-trotting Shah Mehmood Qureshi would be in Delhi in a jiffy at the first signs of a change of heart on your part. Let’s not live as if we are going to live forever.

The writer is a former ambassador. Email: charles123it@hotmail.com


India’s brutality has turned Kashmir into a living hell

September 8, 2010

By Giorgiana Violante

This is the first time in weeks I have had access to the internet. I have not been allowed to receive or send text messages for three months. Just like all Kashmiris my telephone has been barred from such contact. The local news channels have been banned. India controls everything here. And then kills it. The situation is horrific. Over these months of food rationing and persistent curfew whereby all is closed and the streets totally deserted in utter silence, suddenly a protest arises and then spreads throughout the whole city in a surge of frustrated and famished rioters shouting ‘AZADI AZADI AZADI’ (freedom) until it dissipates suddenly into a cacophony of gunshots and clouds of teargas.


Police brutality in Kashmir

I observe all this going on at a safe remove of only one metre by a big thick brick wall interrupted by the Mevlana Rumi gate to Kashmir University, where I am residing. I see through the iron bars hordes upon hordes of protesters being shot at randomly, and I stand there repellently incapable of doing anything. An endless cycle of silence and violence. The Indian army own total control and freedom to shoot at will, to shoot to kill, anyone whom they choose to.

Last week a seven-year-old child was beaten to death. You cannot accidentally beat a seven-year-old to death. It is not like a bullet that goes astray. I cannot see how a stone thrown by a seven-year-old child can do sufficient damage to any man to warrant his being beaten to death. Children in this part of the world are tiny. A seven-year-old is the size of a three-year-old westerner. So what kind of person beats a tiny child to death when his stone throw must carry so little force that it barely deserves a shrug? This is such a common occurrence here.

The other day I left the university grounds to visit a professor only one minute away. True there is curfew but his house is in a private road attached to the university so I thought I would risk it. When I returned a roofless sumo vehicle full of ten Indian army thugs laughing and shouting came charging through the street waving their batons and guns. They headed for an old man and tried to hit him and then they knocked a four-year-old boy off his tricycle. For fun. He was only 50 centimetres outside his house’s garden so that hardly counts as disobeying the curfew and yet they charged at him on purpose. They knocked him off the tricycle and then headed for me, which as a western woman I did not expect.

I am living here within the deserted university grounds, alone with the security guards and a few random professors and clerks. The university was evacuated three months ago when the troubles commenced and the students and school children all over the valley have experienced, as they always do, a great void in their education.

The Indian army gun down eleven-year-old girls banging on the doors of pharmacists when it is clear that their disobedience of the curfew is purely out of desperation. How can a full grown man gun down and kill an eleven-year-old girl banging on a pharmacy door in an empty street? A woman kneeling on the pavement covering her face with her hands had her hands beaten to a pulp and they had to be amputated. Two weeks ago, on a Friday, I heard the usual impassioned pleads for freedom hailing from Hazratbal Mosque, which is just outside the university. For an hour the calls of ‘Azadi’ escalated and escalated until suddenly I heard a spray of gunshots. The shots continued sporadically over the next hour. I later found out that the mosque was raided by the army and people were beaten severely. Some died, of course.

The Indian army have the right and the freedom to behave like this, invading places of worship simply because of impassioned calls for freedom by a people who are being totally crushed and obliterated. This sort of thing happens every day. Total abuse of power by the occupying forces. But the people of Kashmir have no right to retaliate. Nor the freedom to even leave their homes. I cannot bear my complete and utter uselessness in this situation. As a rich westerner even I cannot get food. The other day myself and seven boys shared two carrots between us and a handful of rice.

So how can these Kashmiris be managing when they have not been able to open their businesses for three months? How can they even have the money to afford food, even if there WAS food to be had from somewhere? You risk your life in order to get food. How can you get food without leaving home? Yesterday a young boy working as a clerk in the university showed me his mauled arms and the gash in his thigh. His arms were black and purple with crusted blood from last week. His legs were obscene. Flesh made hell.

‘I went to get medicine’ he said, ‘and the army caught me’. I smiled and said, ‘Oh you people are always getting caught on the way to get medicine. Rubbish it was medicine. You went to get biscuits.’

‘Aren’t biscuits medicine?’ he replied, smiling the same smile as mine.

Last week as I circled the admittedly beautiful university grounds, a forest of chinar trees and endless rows of roses in full bloom, moghul gardens outside every department (Why are these gardens perfectly tendered? Given the situation outside how do these people have the strength and hope to even care to tend their gardens? Everything here is death and hopelessness. I would have expected the gardens to have been left to run to desolation), I saw a thin little old man with a cotton bag full of lumps. Usually one doesn’t see bags. Certainly not ones with lumps in them. Not in these conditions. My mind viciously wondered how he got the food? Who he got it from? Had he bribed one of the army pigs at the university gates? I suddenly realised I was frowning and in a very ugly-minded manner. The ugly things hunger does to a person’s mind is shocking. His bag was probably full of dirty laundry.

Sometimes someone will address me angrily as I pass by, something along the lines of:

“Hey you, America! Why aren’t you helping us? You do something.”

“What can I do?” I reply, “I’m neither a politician nor a journalist. I’m just trapped here like you.”

“But you’re a Westener. You see how things are here. We have been living like this for twenty years. When you go back to your country you tell them. You ask them why they aren’t helping us.”

“It’s your own fault,” I reply. “Why should we bother saving your country when its got no natural resources worth raping? All you’ve got is apples, goats and saffron. You’re doomed.”

A few seconds of silence will be followed by a warm invitation to tea. Muslim hospitality. At this time when every tea leaf is precious these people will share even their last few crumbs of powdered milk with you. And you sit there sipping the tea wondering how and where they managed to procure it and how much it cost them in beatings.


Crunch time in Kashmir

September 6, 2010

By Irfan Husain

Slowly, ever so slowly, the ongoing crisis in Kashmir is seeping into the world’s consciousness.


Indian police and paramilitary soldiers watch Kashmiri Muslim protesters from a distance during a protest in Srinagar, India, Friday, Sept. 3, 2010. Indian police fired tear gas shells Friday to disperse protesters. – Photo by AP.

For years, this unfolding tragedy was explained away through Indian charges of Pakistani involvement in the freedom movement. Much of this was true, as official and unofficial players supported an armed insurgency. But what is happening now in the Valley has nothing to do with cross-border incursions by jihadi militants.

The ongoing protest movement is spearheaded by teenagers armed with nothing except stones and the strength of their convictions. The only shots that have been fired have been by Indian security forces who have caused scores of deaths and injuries among these unarmed protesters. The problem for an uncaring Indian government is that this movement shows no signs of flagging.

If these protests have placed New Delhi in a quandary, they have also marginalised Islamabad. Suddenly, shadowy spooks and Islamic militant groups in Pakistan and Azad Kashmir find themselves sidelined by an amorphous, popular uprising that has no time for home-grown or Pakistani terrorists.

In a recent article (London Review of Books, July 22), Tariq Ali wrote: “Now a new generation of Kashmiri youth is on the march. They fight, like the young Palestinians, with stones. Many have lost their fear of death and will not surrender. Ignored by politicians at home, abandoned by Pakistan, they are developing the independence of spirit that comes with isolation and it will not easily be quelled. It’s unlikely, however, that the prime minister of India and his colleagues will pay any attention to them….”

The Palestinian analogy is apt. There, young stone-throwing protesters have forced their struggle on to the international agenda, as the latest American effort to promote a settlement of the dispute gets under way in Washington. However, the difference lies in how these two conflicts are viewed by the world: the death of a Palestinian protester makes headlines, while several Kashmiris can be killed without any media attention.

Why this difference in how the global media covers these two freedom movements? One reason lies in the fact that while Palestine is viewed as Israeli-occupied territory, Kashmir is considered an integral part of India. Another factor is that India is seen as a reasonable, humane country. As home to Mahatma Gandhi, most people in the West have been influenced by India’s hugely successful projection of its soft power. So much so that people are often blind to its use of hard power.

New Delhi’s crude attempts to crush the movement have resulted in thousands of deaths over the last two decades. An Indian reader recently asked me how the government should deal with the uprising. I suggested that it needs to talk with Kashmiri leaders, and not just lock them up or shoot them. The problem is that the Indian establishment views the ongoing protests as a security issue, not a political one. Indians often see protesters as traitors, and treat them as such.

However, the situation has changed with Pakistan’s virtual absence from the equation. For years, India had accused Islamabad – often with justification – of trying to force a change in the status quo by force. This no longer holds true. Now, even the most rabid Indian nationalist concedes the indigenous nature of the movement.

So what are the options open to the Indian government? The truth is that there is little sympathy in India for the Kashmiri protesters. Left and liberal forces are largely silent on the issue. They may feel uncomfortable over the use of lethal force against unarmed teenagers, but do not really want to confront the core issue of azadi, or freedom, the Kashmiris are demanding.

To be sure, India is not going to give an inch on the question of Kashmiri independence. Over the last 60 years, the Indian position has hardened to the point of becoming a central plank in its national consensus. No Indian politician is prepared to make any concessions. So does this mean an endless use of force to crush a popular, largely peaceful movement? The Economist sees a glimmer of hope. In its Banyan column, the UK weekly says:

“Eventually, however, India may have to contemplate a political solution, for two reasons. One is that small cracks are already appearing in the national consensus behind its repressive policies. So long as it was fighting Pakistan, even liberal Indian opinion seemed ready to tolerate a heavy hand in Kashmir. Less so now that its troops are killing children armed only with stones. Secondly, without change, the cycle of protests will resume.…”

Given India’s refusal to countenance any changes to the political frontiers of Kashmir, and the popular demand for azadi, how can these extreme positions be bridged? Thus far, little attempt has been made to improve life for the impoverished people of the Valley. Civil unrest and two decades of terrorism have kept tourists away. There is an acute and chronic power shortage in the disputed territory that generates a lot of hydro-electric power, most of which is taken elsewhere. Very little private investment comes to the troubled Valley. Unemployment is rife.

Under these conditions, nobody should be surprised that young people have risen in revolt. But even more than economic factors, it is the oppressive presence of over half a million security personnel in the disputed territory that infuriates Kashmiris. Indian officials point out that most of their soldiers are deployed along the Line of Control to counter the Pakistani military presence there.

All the greater need, then, to talk to Pakistan and sort out outstanding border issues, and discuss autonomy issues with Kashmiri leaders. In the original agreements between Britain, India and Pakistan, states at the time of independence only had the option of joining India or Pakistan. But after years of indifference, downright neglect, and repression, Kashmiri attitudes have hardened, too. Now, it seems that the young protesters want nothing to do with either India or Pakistan.

However, in the real world, we seldom get exactly what we want. If India wants to resolve this intractable issue, just wishing it will go away on its own is no longer an option.

irfan.husain@gmail.com


Srinagar tense again, curfew imposed to quell protests

September 1, 2010

NDTV

Srinagar: In Anantnag, the air is filled with the mixture of grief and anger that has become ubiquitous in this part of the country.

The funeral procession of 12-year-old Irshad Ahmed, a Class 6 student, made its way through the streets. Irshad died in clashes during security forces and protesters on Monday evening. Curfew was imposed soon after.

The same weary silence fills Srinagar, where five young men were injured when a policeman fired at them on Monday in the city’s Maisuma area. Those who live nearby say the boys, in their late teens and early 20s, were playing carom when an argument began with the policeman on duty here.

Among those injured are two relatives of separatist leader Yasin Malik. One of them, Yasin’s cousin, Yasir Rafiq, is said to be in critical condition. Rumours that he had died in hospital flared a new round of protests, and the government imposed curfew on Tuesday morning.

The policeman responsible for the firing has since been suspended and arrested. An inquiry has also been ordered.

The crisis in the Valley echoed in Parliament. “How many more children have to be killed? For how long the governments in New Delhi and Kashmir are going to do this?” asked the Left’s Brinda Karat.

Sixty-five civilians, including women and children, have lost their lives in the last three months of strife in the Valley.

As the unrest continues, hardline separatist leader Syed Ali Geelani issued an ultimatum asking New Delhi to accept Kashmir as a dispute or face increased protests.


The valley of tears

August 23, 2010

Aijaz Zaka Syed

Some are born great, argued the Bard, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them. Many of us have “greatness thrust upon them,” thanks to a quirk of circumstances, or thanks to the Creator of those circumstances. Few of us though prove ourselves worthy of the privilege or opportunity presented to us by destiny.

Watching Omar Abdullah struggle, bumble and fumble at the helm even as the ‘paradise on earth’ burns like hell, one cannot help but marvel at the strange games destiny plays with us. What makes the young chief minister qualify for the job, gifted to him by his indulgent father Farooq Abdullah, except his proud pedigree? But what’s new? Farooq Abdullah, a medical doctor by training, inherited the mantle from his legendary father Shaikh Abdullah in similar fashion. Democracy and dynasty go hand in hand in South Asia. Nothing wrong if politics runs in the family, and son – or daughter for that matter – succeeds father or mother in power as they often have in the subcontinent. Trouble arises when those born with a silver spoon cannot hold it.

The mess in Kashmir these days makes you wonder if there is really a government in place in Srinagar. Young boys are getting killed like flies and no one seems to be losing any sleep in Srinagar or Delhi. Nearly 60 youths have died in little over a month. Almost all of them died of gun shots or those “plastic pillets” that are not supposed to kill. And each successive death in turn has fuelled the cauldron of anger and frustration that is today’s Kashmir, bringing thousands more out on the streets. And it’s not just young men who are up in the arms. The spectacle of women throwing stones and clashing with the security forces brings out goose bumps all over.

In the six decades of unrest, the Valley has never seen anything like this. Ominously, the New York Times this week drew parallels between today’s Kashmir and Gaza. The comparison is not justified. No matter what the angry Kashmiris today think, India is not Israel and thank God for that! This is not because of its enterprising politicians but because of its robust democratic institutions, civil society, the judiciary and the media.

Intriguingly though, the democratic India has been largely silent over the plight of ordinary Kashmiris. The mainstream media, ever ready to pounce on a newsy issue, has been either totally ignoring the issue or as usual projects the protests as something choreographed from across the border. So even if young boys are casually killed on a daily basis, for our media, civil society and politicians, it’s little more than a footnote in the narrative of India-Pakistan politics. This is really sad and I do not know where this indifference of ours in Kashmir is eventually going to take us.

While the rest of the country has been busy celebrating the ascent of new India and its new-found wealth, unprecedented prosperity and rising global stature, Kashmir has gone through a quiet but watershed change. Its total disconnect and alienation with the rest of India has never been more disturbing and complete.

Who’s to blame for this mess? Omar Abdullah may be responsible for mishandling the current ‘law-and-order’ crisis, as many in the media call it. His humiliation this Independence Day when a suspended cop threw his heavy boot at the chief minister was shocking but not surprising.

When God chooses to slight someone, He does so in strange ways. While Omar regained his composure in no time, his irrepressible father had to valiantly draw comfort from the fact that the chief minister was now in the distinguished company of such worthies as George W Bush, Home Minister Chidambaram and Zardari, of course. But maybe it’s unfair to single out Abdullah junior for the worsening crisis in the Valley. He certainly did not start or cause it. It’s the result of decades of morally bankrupt policies and the zero sum game of the subcontinent twins in which the Kashmiris find themselves hopelessly caught. And one doesn’t see any end in sight either.

Unfortunately, South Asia today is full of self-serving, petty politicians but singularly bereft of great leaders who can bring lasting peace to this cursed piece of land.

Talking of great leaders, one had great expectations from Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh. Incidentally, Dr Singh has just crossed a historic milestone by becoming the longest serving prime minister after Jawaharlal Nehru and his feisty daughter Indira Gandhi. Defying all predictions and projections, Dr Singh has completed nearly six years in power. Six years! Boy, was it really that long?

It’s been a heady ride for the prime minister and the Congress-led UPA coalition. Strangely though, throughout his first term and in the past two years, the only policy that seems to have enjoyed the prime minister’s attention is the foreign policy, or the US policy, to be more precise, at the cost of everything else. No wonder every minister in the federal government seems to be working on his own or at cross-purposes. One minister doesn’t seem to know, or care, what the other is doing. It’s as though there’s no government in Delhi and this huge, giant of a country of a billion people is miraculously functioning on its own.

The government’s pathetic response to the shame of Common Wealth Games scandal is shocking, to say the least. Even as the media screams about the involvement of the high and mighty in the scam of hundreds of millions of rupees, a belligerent Suresh Kalmadi not only remains untouched but continues to be on the CWG organising committee and the voice and face of the government. It’s as if the entire government has been struck by a paralysis from top down. But it’s the government’s response to the Kashmir unrest that really takes the cake. It’s been three months since the current phase of protests began in June with the killing of a teenager and we are yet to see a sincere and effective attempt to put out the fire in the Valley, except for perfunctory statements and meetings.

This is really unfortunate for a prime minister who has repeatedly expressed his keenness to win back the Kashmiri hearts and minds as well as resolve this business with Pakistan once and for all. But Dr Singh can do little on his own, without the active support from his own party and party leadership. What the Valley needs today is not more empty rhetoric or economic packages but a real healing touch and respect from politicians in Delhi and Srinagar. The Valley’s wounds will heal only when the jackboots leave. For the longer Kashmir bleeds, the more distant it will grow from us.

The writer is opinion editor of the Khaleej Times. Email: aijaz@ khaleejtimes.com


The Bleeding Vale of Kashmir

August 23, 2010

By Brig Asif Haroon Raja

The cauldron of Kashmir continues to simmer and smolder in view of India’s scorched earth policy. Appalling human rights abuses and atrocities have been committed against civilian population. According to recently published Human Rights report, between 1989 and June 30, 2010, the number of Kashmiris killed at the hands of Indian security forces stands at 93,274. Additionally, there have been 6969 custodial killing, over 107,351 children have been orphaned, 22,728 women widowed and 9920 women gang raped. 11735 persons were arrested and 105861 houses or structures in use were razed.


Kasmir is bleeding; India competing with Israel

Ever since indigenous armed resistance commenced in Indian Held Kashmir (IHK) in 1989, India has been incessantly holding Pakistan responsible for the uprising. It portrayed the freedom struggle as terrorist movement wholly aided by Pakistan. India didn’t take into account the hard realities that Kashmiris had sustained the cruelties of Indian forces for too long. They had been repeatedly duped and promise of plebiscite made by Jawahar Lal Nehru made in 1948 remained unfulfilled. They had got fed up of the puppet state regimes imposed upon them and the lackluster approach of Pakistan towards their cause.

They got inspired by the Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979 followed by Palestinian intifada in 1987 and grand victory of Mujahideen against a super power in Afghanistan in 1988. These events catapulted the otherwise insipid and terrorized Kashmiris who would not pick up courage to even protest against abuses of Indian security forces. This was evident from their poor response to Operation Gibraltar launched By Pakistani irregulars in August 1965 aimed at helping the Kashmiris to realize their dream of freedom from India. Kashmiri youths from 1990 onwards were a transformed lot, fully motivated and charged up. No amount of brutal force and torture applied by Indian forces would break their will to fight back.

Few thousand Kashmiri Mujahideen kept over 700,000 regular and paramilitary forces in a spin and Kashmir became a bleeding wound for India. They showed their extraordinary grit and firmness during the Kargil conflict in summer of 1999 where in conjunction with irregulars of Northern Light Infantry, they kept the might of Indian Army at bay for ten weeks. The US and G-8 countries had to intervene to force Pakistan to vacate the occupied heights. After suffering humiliation at Kargil, India had to suffer another embarrassment when its ten-month military standoff failed to intimidate Pakistan and it had to withdraw its forces in October 2002.

India sought assistance from Israel how to deal with Kashmiri militants and learnt new methods of torture but to no effect. By 2003, Indian troops employed in IHK had become fatigued and demoralized. Cases of indiscipline, soldiers firing at seniors, desertions, suicides, and mental disorders rose phenomenally. Hospitals got filled up with malingerers and psychiatric cases. Recruitment in Army dropped radically despite announcing better pay packages. Kashmir became a dreaded station and none liked to be posted there. It was under such unsavory conditions that Indo-Pak peace treaty facilitated by USA was signed in January 2004.

In his exuberance to appease India so that an amicable solution to Kashmir dispute and other disputes of Siachin, Sir Creek and dams on rivers could be found, Gen Musharraf took several steps to remove Indian concerns. He gave a written pledge that he would not allow Pakistan soil for exporting terrorism. He banned six Jihadi outfits engaged in supporting freedom struggle in IHK and ceased their funds. By restoring peace in Kashmir, he allowed India to fence the Line of Control (LoC) and also took stringent measures to curb movement across the LoC.

All Parties Hurryat Conference (APHC) got split between moderates and extremists, former led by Mir Waiz and latter by Syed Ali Shah Geelani. Moderates agreed to hold negotiations with Indian leaders and to workout an out of box solution as proposed by Musharraf which was outside the realms of UNSC Resolutions. Musharraf’s one-sided initiatives delivered severe blows to the indigenous struggle waged by Kashmiri armed freedom fighters that had intensified in 2003-04. Indian leaders started admitting after 2005 that cross border infiltration had reduced to a trickle. Instead of appreciating efforts put in by Pakistan Indian military claimed that stringent measures adopted by them had not only blocked movement of foreign terrorists but also the insurgency in IHK.

Peace along LoC and in IHK helped India to use Afghan soil to export terrorism into Pakistan and to create situation similar to IHK. India created and supported terrorist outfits for Balochistan and FATA to destabilize Pakistan. It was also able to hold general elections in the state in 2007 which brought in pro-India National Conference and Congress in power. Since the voters’ turnout was over 50%, Indian leaders started to brag that foreign sponsored insurgency had almost been quashed and there was no need for negotiations. They once again reverted to their uncompromising stance that Kashmir was integral part of India and its further division was out of question. The only leeway they wanted to give was to treat LoC as permanent border between two Kashmirs. The Kashmiris once again felt let down by Pakistan, betrayed by India and ignored by the world as they had felt in 1989.

There was also resentment among younger generation of Kashmir against their leaders for getting hoodwinked by Indian sweet talk and damaging the movement. The movement got reignited on a dispute over land being allotted to Amarnath Shrine Board in summer of 2008 and economic blockade imposed by Hindus in Jammu. The whole Valley resounded with slogans of Azadi (freedom) and pro-Pakistan slogans. Hundreds of thousands of people defied curfews and heavy presence of security forces. Soldiers and policemen fired straight into the crowds killing scores of people but protests continued unabated. It was the first manifestation of democratic, non-violent protests as note by Arundhati Roy.

Intensity and resoluteness of unarmed protests by Kashmiris in Srinagar and other major towns of the Valley unnerved India and the state government. Protests over India’s black laws and oppressive and unjust policies continued for months but neither Pakistan nor the world took any note of their plight. Policy of picking up suspects, putting them in secret dungeons and torturing them, fake encounters and rape continued unabatedly. The second bout of unarmed protests took place in the summer of 2009, which were ruthlessly dealt with by Indian forces disregarding that the protestors had no arms.

Fresh wave of mass agitation against India’s rule in J&K spearheaded by unarmed teenagers have spread across Kashmir Valley since last June. Intensity of protests is growing with each passing day. In June 2010 alone, 33 people were killed including four children. 572 people were tortured and injured and eight women were molested. 59 Kashmiris, mostly teenagers including an eight-year boy have been killed till 14 August by CRPF and Police. Each killing is fuelling more anger and they are coming out on streets in greater numbers.

It is high time for champions of human rights to listen to the cries of Kashmiris and take stock of atrocities perpetrated by Indian forces, killing small kids and old men and raping Kashmiri women with gusto. Peace in South Asia will remain illusive without a solution to Kashmir dispute, which has also bred extremism and terrorism in the region. Indian leaders must come out of their uncompromising and stubborn mode by fulfilling the pledge of their reverend leader Nehru and hold a plebiscite in Kashmir. Farce of Aman ki Asha and other deceitful games would work no more. Resolution of longstanding Kashmir dispute will usher in peace and prosperity in South Asia, which is primed for a bigger explosion because of discontentment and burgeoning poverty. The UNSC and USA should let go their duplicitous policy and act before it is too late.

Brig Asif Haroon Raja an Member Board of Advisors Opinion Maker is Staff College and Armed Forces War Course qualified, holds MSc war studies degree; a second generation officer, he fought epic battle of Hilli in northwest East Bengal during 1971 war, in which Maj M. Akram received Nishan-e-Haider posthumously. He served as Directing Staff Command & Staff College, Defence Attaché Egypt and Sudan and Dean of Corps of Military Attaches in Cairo. He commanded the heaviest brigade in Kashmir. He is lingual and speaks English, Pashto and Punjabi fluently. He is author of books titled ‘Battle of Hilli’, ’1948, 1965 & 1971 Kashmir Battles and Freedom Struggle’, ‘Muhammad bin Qasim to Gen Musharraf’, Roots of 1971 Tragedy’; has written number of motivational pamphlets. Draft of his next book ‘Tangled Knot of Kashmir’ is ready. He is a defence analyst and columnist and writes articles on security, defence and political matters for numerous international/national newspapers/websites


Reflections on India

August 16, 2010

By Sean Paul Kelley

If you are Indian, or of Indian descent, I must preface this post with a clear warning: you are not going to like what I have to say. My criticisms may be very hard to stomach. But consider them as the hard words and loving advice of a good friend. Someone who’s being honest with you and wants nothing from you. These criticisms apply to all of India except Kerala and the places I didn’t visit, except that I have a feeling it applies to all of India, except as I mentioned before, Kerala. Lastly, before anyone accuses me of Western Cultural Imperialism, let me say this: if this is what India and Indians want, then hey, who am I to tell them differently. Take what you like and leave the rest. In the end it doesn’t really matter, as I get the sense that Indians, at least many upper class Indians, don’t seem to care and the lower classes just don’t know any better, what with Indian culture being so intense and pervasive on the sub-continent. But here goes, nonetheless.

India is a mess. It’s that simple, but it’s also quite complicated. I’ll start with what I think are India’s four major problems-the four most preventing India from becoming a developing nation-and then move to some of the ancillary ones.

First, pollution. In my opinion the filth, squalor and all around pollution indicates a marked lack of respect for India by Indians. I don’t know how cultural the filth is, but it’s really beyond anything I have ever encountered. At times the smells, trash, refuse and excrement are like a garbage dump. Right next door to the Taj Mahal was a pile of trash that smelled so bad, was so foul as to almost ruin the entire Taj experience. Delhi, Bangalore and Chennai to a lesser degree were so very polluted as to make me physically ill. Sinus infections, ear infection, bowels churning was an all to common experience in India. Dung, be it goat, cow or human fecal matter was common on the streets. In major tourist areas filth was everywhere, littering the sidewalks, the roadways, you name it. Toilets in the middle of the road, men urinating and defecating anywhere, in broad daylight. Whole villages are plastic bag wastelands. Roadsides are choked by it. Air quality that can hardly be called quality.Far too much coal and far to few unleaded vehicles on the road. The measure should be how dangerous the air is for one’s health, not how good it is. People casually throw trash in the streets, on the roads. The only two cities that could be considered sanitary in my journey were Trivandrum-the capital of Kerala-and Calicut. I don’t know why this is. But I can assure you that at some point this pollution will cut into India’s productivity, if it already hasn’t. The pollution will hobble India’s growth path, if that indeed is what the country wants. (Which I personally doubt, as India is far too conservative a country, in the small ‘c’ sense.) More after the jump.

The second issue, infrastructure, can be divided into four subcategories: roads, rails and ports and the electrical grid. The electrical grid is a joke. Load shedding is all too common, everywhere in India. Wide swaths of the country spend much of the day without the electricity they actually pay for. With out regular electricity, productivity, again, falls. The ports are a joke. Antiquated, out of date, hardly even appropriate for the mechanized world of container ports, more in line with the days of longshoremen and the like. Roads are an equal disaster. I only saw one elevated highway that would be considered decent in Thailand, much less Western Europe or America. And I covered fully two thirds of the country during my visit. There are so few dual carriage way roads as to be laughable. There are no traffic laws to speak of, and if there are, they are rarely obeyed, much less enforced. A drive that should take an hour takes three. A drive that should take three takes nine. The buses are at least thirty years old,if not older. Everyone in India, or who travels in India raves about the railway system. Rubbish. It’s awful. Now, when I was there in 2003 and then late 2004 it was decent. But in the last five years the traffic on the rails has grown so quickly that once again, it is threatening productivity. Waiting in line just to ask a question now takes thirty minutes. Routes are routinely sold out three and four days in advance now, leaving travelers stranded with little option except to take the decrepit and dangerous buses. At least fifty million people use the trains a day in India. 50 million people! Not surprising that waitlists of 500 or more people are common now. The rails are affordable and comprehensive but they are overcrowded and what with budget airlines popping up in India like Sadhus in an ashram the middle and lowers classes are left to deal with the overutilized rails and quality suffers. No one seems to give a shit. Seriously, I just never have the impression that the Indian government really cares. Too interested in buying weapons from Russia, Israel and the US I guess.

The last major problem in India is an old problem and can be divided into two parts that’ve been two sides of the same coin since government was invented: bureaucracy and corruption. It take triplicates to register into a hotel. To get a SIM card for one’s phone is like wading into a jungle of red-tape and photocopies one is not likely to emerge from in a good mood, much less satisfied with customer service. Getting train tickets is a terrible ordeal, first you have to find the train number, which takes 30 minutes, then you have to fill in the form, which is far from easy, then you have to wait in line to try and make a reservation, which takes 30 minutes at least and if you made a single mistake on the form back you go to the end of the queue, or what passes for a queue in India. The government is notoriously uninterested in the problems of the commoners, too busy fleecing the rich, or trying to get rich themselves in some way shape or form. Take the trash for example, civil rubbish collection authorities are too busy taking kickbacks from the wealthy to keep their areas clean that they don’t have the time, manpower, money or interest in doing their job. Rural hospitals are perennially understaffed as doctors pocket the fees the government pays them, never show up at the rural hospitals and practice in the cities instead.

I could go on for quite some time about my perception of India and its problems, but in all seriousness, I don’t think anyone in India really cares. And that, to me, is the biggest problem. India is too conservative a society to want to change in any way. Mumbai, India’s financial capital is about as filthy, polluted and poor as the worst city imaginable in Vietnam, or Indonesia-and being more polluted than Medan, in Sumatra is no easy task. The biggest rats I have ever seen were in Medan!

One would expect a certain amount of, yes, I am going to use this word, backwardness, in a country that hasn’t produced so many Nobel Laureates, nuclear physicists, imminent economists and entrepreneurs. But India has all these things and what have they brought back to India with them? Nothing. The rich still have their servants, the lower castes are still there to do the dirty work and so the country remains in stasis. It’s a shame. Indians and India have many wonderful things to offer the world, but I’m far from sanguine that India will amount to much in my lifetime.

Now, have at it, call me a cultural imperialist, a spoiled child of the West and all that. But remember, I’ve been there. I’ve done it. And I’ve seen 50 other countries on this planet and none, not even Ethiopia, have as long and gargantuan a laundry list of problems as India does. And the bottom line is, I don’t think India really cares. Too complacent and too conservative.

Sean Paul Kelley is a travel writer, former radio host, and before that an asset manager for a Wall Street investment bank that is still (barely) alive. He recently left a fantastic job in Singapore working for Solar Winds, a software company based out of Austin to travel around the world for a year (or two). He founded The Agonist, in 2002, which is still considered the top international affairs, culture and news destination for progressives. He is also the Global Correspondent for The Young Turks, on satellite radio and Air America.


The world wants to think the best about India. So we turn our back on Kashmir

August 16, 2010

By Dean Nelson


Kashmiris run for cover as Indian paramilitary soldiers fire teargas shells (Photo: AP)

Think of India and it’s all Gandhian saintliness, Ravi Shankar’s sitar, a whiff of incense and the feel-good beats of Bollywood Bhangra. These memories, sounds and smells conjure images of the world’s largest democracy, where tolerance and spirituality supposedly reign over realpolitik.

We don’t think of it as a country whose troops are jailing opposition leaders or placing them under house arrest, denying people the right to gather in prayer, beating children to death, or massacring stone-throwing protesters. The words “shoot to kill” are a grim relic from our own recent past, and certainly nothing we ever associate with India.

That’s why India is the world’s first “soft superpower”. It can barely do wrong for doing right, and if it does we don’t really want to know. As David Cameron made perfectly clear during his recent visit, we’re interested in India as the world’s second fastest-growing economy and by its contribution to the war on terrorism, but not how it treats its own people.

So despite the fact that 50 mainly young men and teenagers have either been shot or beaten to death in the last eight weeks in Kashmir; the two main separatist leaders have been jailed or placed under house arrest; that the Kashmir Valley has been locked down and the streets of Srinagar occupied by swaggering Indian troops who threaten housewives with big sticks, our leaders have remained completely silent.

Had these incidents been in Taliban-controlled parts of Afghanistan, or had the victims been Tibetans revolting against Chinese rule, we would have called it a massacre. But India’s great “soft power” is that the world wants to think the best of it.

To that end, our leaders overlooked the 53 young men and teenagers who were treated for bullet wounds in just one hospital in Kashmir’s state capital, Srinagar, last week. They had been shot either for throwing stones during protests against killings by Indian security forces in Kashmir – or for being in the wrong place at the wrong time in their own city.

This present wave of protests began after Indian soldiers shot dead three young Muslim men in the hope of passing them off as Pakistani terrorists and themselves as war heroes. They had lured them with the promise of jobs. A few weeks later a 17-year-old schoolboy was killed when Indian police fired a tear gas canister at his head.

Last week I interviewed Fayaz Ahmad Rah, a Srinagar fruit seller, as he mourned the death of his nine-year-old son, Sameer. Neighbours told me they had seen members of India’s paramilitary Central Reserve Police Force beat him to death with sticks and then dump his body in stinging nettles. The CRPF claims he was in fact a protester and that he had been trampled by other demonstrators as they fled a police advance.

Fayaz said his son had been walking through their usually safe tiny back lanes to his uncle’s house 100 metres away after stopping to buy sweets. When he washed his son’s body for burial, there was a half-chewed toffee still in his mouth, he said.

Over the last eight weeks a round of teenage civilian deaths, protests and more shootings followed by further protests has sucked Kashmir into a bleak vortex. But since it began, not a single member of India’s security forces has been shot or killed. It couldn’t be a more unequal contest.

Luckily for India, it happened in Kashmir where the words “Muslim”, “Pakistan” and “militants” shield what is either bad marksmanship or a shoot to kill policy from scrutiny and criticism.

This decision to look the other way only fuels the anger in Kashmir. From his home where he was being held under house arrest last week, separatist spiritual leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq told me India had turned Kashmir into a “police state” and that British politicians and others were turning their back on it.

He had not been allowed to go to his mosque for more than six weeks, while other separatist Hurriyat leaders were also in jail or under house arrest. In many mosques throughout the state, only men over the age of 50 – regarded as beyond their stone-throwing years – have been allowed to meet to pray.

“It’s a direct interference in our religious affairs, a situation in which in a muslim state, if we’re not allowed to pray, the Muftis will say we have to call a war on the state,” he said.

Those demonstrating are part of a new generation born into violent protest which has seen leaders like Mirwaiz Umar Farooq sacrifice their credibility for talks with India, which came to nothing. “People now ask the question ‘you went for dialogue, what did you get? Did the killings or violence or disappearances stop?’ All it did was undermine the credibility of those who wanted, like me, to give dialogue a chance,” he said.

He believes India is not sincere about talks and is only interested in continual delay in the hope that protests and the desire for Kashmiri independence will peter out.

India has its own arguments, of course. It focuses on earlier killings and “ethnic cleansing” of Kashmiri pandits, and the reluctance of Buddhist Ladakh and Hindu and Sikh majority Jammu to follow the Muslim-dominated Kashmir Valley into Pakistan or independence. It criticises the refusal of separatist parties to take part in state assembly elections.

These are valid points, and I certainly don’t have the answers to a problem which has blighted India and Pakistan and provoked three wars between the nuclear enemies since their independence from Britain.

But I do think Britain might come to regret its silence and India its troops’ brutality. We risk alienating the remaining friends we have in the Muslim world and within our own substantial Kashmiri community in Britain. India risks losing the tremendous goodwill it had built up throughout the world over decades.

The Kashmiris, on the other hand, have little left to lose: the world has forgotten them.


Terrorist face

August 11, 2010

ANUPAMA KATAKAM in Mumbai

The Malegaon investigations showed for the first time that Hindu right-wing terror cells exist.

MITESH BHUVAD/PTI
MITESH BHUVAD.JPG
The Malegaon blast accused when they were produced in court at various times. (From left) Ajay Rahirkar, Lt Col Shrikant Prasad Purohit and Rakesh Dhawade (partly hidden).

FROM 2002 until 2008, there had been several minor yet noticeable bomb blast incidents in Maharashtra and neighbouring States. The involvement of Hindu right-wing members in them was alleged but there was no concrete proof of this. Then, on September 29, 2008, the Malegaon blast happened. It resulted in the death of six persons and injuries to many in the predominantly Muslim area. The State’s Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) went after every possible suspect and eventually hit the shocking terror trail of Hindutva-driven fundamentalists, many of whom had links to national-level political parties. Their agenda, as the investigations by the ATS showed, was to create a Hindu Rashtra by fighting terror with terror.

Within a few weeks of the blast at Bhiku Chowk, a crowded area in the small textile town, the ATS arrested 11 persons, including Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, a former member of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP). All of them were subsequently charge-sheeted. They have also been linked to some of the other blasts in the State, such as those in Nanded, Parbhani and Jalna; the police are yet to establish their involvement conclusively.

On July 19, 2010, the Bombay High Court upheld the charges against the Sadhvi and the others, including an Army officer Lt Col Shrikant Purohit, under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). This is the first time members of a Hindu right-wing organisation have been accused of carrying out violent, anti-national activities.

Essentially, the Malegaon investigations revealed that Hindu right-wing terror cells existed and that terror attacks were not exclusive to jehadi groups. From the charge-sheet filed in 2009, it emerges that the members of the saffron brigade, who are known to be rabble-rousers, have found other means to strike terror and propagate their agenda.

Ever since bombs exploded at masjids in Parbhani (2003), Jalna (2004) and Purna (2004), the involvement of Hindu groups in terror activities was suspected. The suspicions were strengthened in 2006 when a bomb that was being assembled in the house of a member of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) in Nanded exploded. The Malegaon blast, in which six people were killed, was confirmation, in a sense, of the existence of Hindu right-wing terror.

Interestingly, since the arrest of the Sadhvi and the others, there has only been one incident involving Hindutva activists. In October 2009, two men died in Margao, Goa, when a bomb they were carrying exploded. The men were linked to the Sanatan Sanstha, a right-wing group with a presence in Maharashtra and Goa. During the investigations, the police recovered two unexploded improvised explosive devices (IEDs) at Sancaole, Goa, which they believe belong to the Sanstha or a similar organisation.

The charge-sheet

After an exhaustive study of the terror trail, ATS chief K.P. Raghuvanshi and his team filed a 4,528-page charge-sheet against the group involved in the Malegaon blast. The charge-sheet was put together on the basis of evidence that included several hours of telephone call transcripts and contains explosive details of the group’s operations and beliefs.

SANTOSH HIRLEKAR/PTI
SANTOSH HIRLEKAR.JPG
Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur; and (right) Swami Dayanand Pandey.

The 11 accused arrested are Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Prasad Purohit, Sudhakar Dwivedi alias Dayanand Pandey, Rakesh Dhawade, Sameer Kulkarni, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Shivnarayan Kalsangra, Shyam Sahu, Major Ramesh Upadhyay (retd), Ajay Rahirkar and Jagdish Mhatra. Among the people accused but absconding are Ramji, Sandeep Vishwas Dange and Pravin Mutalik. Ramji’s capture, say the police, can unravel much more on the activities of the group.

Conspiracy

Another mastermind who goes by the name Swami Asimanand is also missing. His capture should shed more light on whether the various blasts are linked to the same group of people, say the police.

The charge-sheet points to a larger conspiracy hatched by the accused. Malegaon was their first big act of terror. The accused chose Malegaon for its high concentration of Muslims. Furthermore, they hoped to mislead the investigating agencies into going after the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) because it had been held responsible for an attack in the town in 2006.

The telephone conversations recorded in the charge-sheet give the impression that the Sadhvi was disappointed by the extent of destruction caused by the blast. She says in a phone call to one of the accused: “Why did so few people die? Why didn’t you park [the bike] in a crowded area?”

Abhinav Bharat

The charge-sheet says the accused are linked to a Hindu fundamentalist group called Abhinav Bharat. It was to be a front organisation “with the intention of propagating a Hindu Rashtra” with its “own constitution and aims and objectives [such] as Bharat Swaraya, Surajya Suraksha”. The Abhinav Bharat had put together an ambitious plan that called for a Taliban-like government that would ensure that India was rid of anyone opposed to the idea of a Hindu Rashtra.

A motorcycle placed at the bomb site to aid the explosion eventually led the police to Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur as its owner. Her arrest in Surat was the key to unravelling the Malegaon plot. Pragya Singh was once an active member of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and a member of Durga Vahini, the VHP’s women’s wing.

SHASHANK PARADE/PTI SHIRISH SHETE/PTI
SHASHANK PARADE-PTI SHIRISH SHETE.JPG
Retired Army Officer Ramesh Upadhyay, Rakesh Dhawade (behind him), and (right) Sudhakar Chaturvedi, three of the accused in the case.

Interrogation indicated that in the past few years, she had been a member of various right-wing organisations and had been in touch with godmen, Hindu spiritual leaders and those inclined towards Hindu extremism. Defending herself in court, she said she and the two others arrested along with her were innocent and claimed that they were being implicated as part of a larger game to defame the Hindutva movement.

Soon after her arrest the police made a major breakthrough with the arrest of a serving Army officer, Lt Col Purohit. He allegedly provided the RDX (Research Department Explosive, also called cyclonite) for the bomb and, along with Ramji, masterminded the operation.

Purohit was the main planner and trainer, says the charge-sheet. At Abhinav Bharat meetings held in Ahmedabad, Ujjain, Faridabad, Kolkata, Bhopal, Jabalpur, Indore, Pune and Nashik, Purohit would recruit people for carrying out attacks. He even managed to raise Rs.21 lakh for the organisation.

The investigation into Purohit’s background led the police to the Bhonsala Military School in Nashik, which the RSS apparently uses to train its cadre. Purohit had attended a short-term course here long ago and in the recent past he allegedly held a few meetings at the school. According to information available on the school, its founder, B.S. Moonje, was influenced by fascist leaders such as Mussolini and had decided to establish an institution to further this ideology.

Teesta Setalvad, an activist with the Committee for Peace and Justice, insists that the school is a hotbed of RSS activity and has called for its scrutiny in the Malegaon blast case.

The other attention-grabbing aspect of the Malegaon case is the involvement of Himani Savarkar, a niece of Nathuram Godse (Mahatma Gandhi’s assassin) and daughter-in-law of Narayan Savarkar, the brother of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. Himani is a member of Abhinav Bharat and was present at the meeting in which the Malegaon conspiracy was hatched. She is yet to be questioned and the police do not want to comment on this angle.

It is not entirely clear where the perpetrators sourced their funds for the operation. What is clear is that money was not a problem. The use of RDX, the training given to people in handling weapons, and the indications of the presence an extensive network are enough proof of that.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers