Area 14/8: The Upside to Divisive Power-play

May 23, 2013

By Z. FEROZE
Area 14/8

While western scholars deem it necessary to permit a revolution in Pakistan, the question of whether or not we require a messiah has often boggled the intelligentsia. While nationalism and tradition hailed in Balochistan and Punjab respectively, a ghastly series of repercussions garnered results such as the killing of PTI leader Zahra Shahid Hussain in Sindh. Common sense dictates that Sindh is desperately in need for a political messiah to alleviate the town in lieu of target killings, ethnic violence harboring separatism and a scraped social fabric and security. The general disputation among the intelligentsia regarding the failing political situation of Karachi, the hub of the most influential political party in Sindh, has been to chalk out the cause and effect of the town’s social tumult. Without doubt, MQM is an important power-player that has repatriated ethnic devises and fuelled ethnocentrism of the Muhajir, directly as well as indirectly. Reduced to victimized manipulation, the people of Karachi have fixated on this politics of division and extortion. With an alarming number of people losing their lives to a lack of social security, the solution to a monochromatic political representation of Karachi has been wishy-washy. The Election of 2013, however, reworked the political dynamics of Karachi and managed to considerably compromise the strain exacted by the MQM influence on the region.

Read more…


The boy who cried wolf

February 21, 2013

ZoneAsia-Pk

The announcement for the annulment of assemblies on March 16th was a wakeup call for political parties all across Pakistan. The clock is ticking and the time to make changes, stir up electoral issues and leave a lasting impression on voters in now here. It is thus quite remarkable how projects like the Metro Bus in Punjab, the promise of target operation against religious extremists in Quetta and MQM’s concern for Karachi’s insecurity transpired at this momentous time.

Withdrawal of murder cases of Lyari’s criminal gang members’ specifically those belonging to the Peoples Aman Committee and the failed implementation of Sindh Peoples Local Government Ordinance (SPLGO) in Karachi were the last straw for MQM. In a televised briefing on February 16th, Dr. Farooq Sattar, MQM Coordination Committee Deputy Convener, officially terminated MQM’s alliance with PPP at both the federal and provincial level. He accused PPP of delaying the process of justice by harboring criminals identified as absconders by the courts. MQM had expressed its reservations a few days earlier too but PPP representatives either denied the withdrawal order for or gave reassurances of reconciliation efforts.

It must be noted that this is not MQM’s first attempt to break their alliance with PPP. It has done so several times in the past and soon afterwards tends to mend fences. Given this trend, other political parties including Jamaat-e-Islami, Sunni Tehreek, Save Sindh Movement, National Peoples Party and PML-Q (Likeminded) were suspicious of a conspiracy. Chaudhry Nisar, Leader of the Opposition and member of PML-N called MQM’s move a “joke”. He refused to consult MQM in the formation of a caretaker setup.

MQM’s separation will not have an impact on the overall functioning of the government. As far as provincial politics are concerned, MQM continues to have a strong voter bases in Karachi and Hyderabad. PPP might have lost MQM but it would translate to the loss of only a few seats since PPP has a dominating presence in many areas of Sindh.

Many have questioned what MQM can achieve in this short period of time as part of the opposition. If they hope that breaking ties with PPP will exonerate them from being an accessory to the nation’s insecurity and economic downfall and thus prove the sincerity of their motives, they are badly mistaken. Its party leaders argue that an earlier break would have risked derailing the government. It is however, quite unlikely that they would reconcile with PPP since the government is set to be dissolved on March 16th.

So how is this breakup different from the rest? This time MQM may in fact be planning for a pre-election scenario. The government is bound to take into consideration the view of the opposition in installing a caretaker setup. As members of the opposition, MQM will prevail over other nationalist parties especially PML-F in appointing an opposition leader in the Sindh Assembly. This will give MQM a chance to contribute to the selection of a caretaker chief minister and therefore, maintain their influence until the elections. MQM’s move puts the 17-month stalled appointment of a leader of opposition in a new light. It seems that Governor Dr. Ishrat ul Ebad may have been saving the seat for his MQM brothers. The fact that contrary to the claims of MQM leadership, Ebad has not handed in his resignation means that MQM plans to have the cake and eat and eat it too.

Another explanation for PPP withdrawing cases was also offered; it may be seeking voters from People Aman Committee. While this may be true, it is more likely that the MQM-PPP fight is a farce. Contesting elections from both sides of the fence, this duo could crush PML-N, which has been making headway in building alliances with Sindh’s political parties and emerge successful in Sindh. If PPP is unable to win a re-election, as leader of the opposition MQM will still have the opportunity to negotiate a partnership with the ruling party.

On Saturday, MQM chief Altaf Hussain said “When forces, instead of providing protection to the masses, are protecting criminals, the people will take extreme steps for their safety.” What Hussain doesn’t realize is that these very masses also know that he may not be more than just a boy who cried wolf.


Tacstrat Analysis: Procrastination over the Pipeline

February 7, 2013

1_tacstrat logo

Conceived by a Pakistani civil engineer in the 1950s, and brought on the table between the concerned parties in 1995, the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline project has remained on the forefront, and brushed aside with an unbecoming ease. The pipeline that aims to connect Iran’s biggest gas field in South Pars with neighboring Pakistan and India has become a matter of global interest. Pakistan’s energy crisis and Iran’s economic boycott, owing to the Khomeini regime’s adamancy with respect to their nuclear program, make the pipeline a win-win bargain for the two. Yet, with Pakistan’s instability, and an inability to pick a side, the pipeline, as we enter 2013, remains a far fetched thought. Despite recent positive angle, and signing of contracts on 4 February 2012 between the two governments, we realize this is not the first time Pakistan has come so close and withdrawn.

Summer 2012 took the energy crisis to new heights altogether. With load-shedding in many of Punjab’s housing colonies at a shocking 20 hours a day, the gap between supply and demand had reached a shocking 40%. The battlefield over Punjab’s assailing energy shortage became the perfect ground to exploit political grievances. At steak mostly remains Punjab’s once flourishing industrial sector. With ‘thermal power’ as the only reliable alternative, the high cost of this substitute has shut down various plants. Those still functioning, owing to the expenses of productions fail to compete in the market where growing economies like Bangladesh are standing on the same platform. Moreover, private power houses have either slashed down production, or shut down completely because of the government’s failure to pay them.

While Pakistan gets embroiled in a circular debt, that stood at a tall $880 million last summer, as the government pays only when the power generation houses are on the verge of suing, structural problems fail to be addressed, and the sloppy mammoth continues to move at its own painfully slow pace. Pakistani academics, politicians and technocrats, with the help of allies have looked into various regional and local solutions. A heated debate was over the Kalabagh dam. Theoretically the dam could have also prevented half of Punjab and Sindh from flooding, and millions worth of damage (not to mention the lives), but as a solution to our energy crisis, the local and federal cannot agree on a solution. Secondly, the United States, that wants to isolate Iran, and simultaneously make the Afghan and Central Asian bloc economically superior, expects Pakistan to conform.

A third option, newly tapped, is cashing on the hot, sunny sweltering heat of the plains, more specifically the sunlight. November 2012 the Punjab government signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the German government. The best part about solar panels is it’s a onetime investment and runs for free on sunlight on its own. With the PML-N working on these alternatives, it is understood by the federal government that the power shortage entails Pakistan cannot be selective, but must look into multiple sources. The solar project, if executed effectively alone can tap part of the than 2.4 million megawatts of light energy going to waste. Renewable sources a safe and environment friendly solution.

Looking into innovative ways to resolve the energy deficit, which is taking a grave toll on Pakistan’s industry and standard of life, however is not sufficient. At this point Pakistan, like in most critical political points, is again torn between two opposing ends. Our alliance with the United States, India’s silent conformity, Pakistan remains in a tough loop. The United States wants to isolate Iran: straight, blunt, and no flowery diplomacy to coat that bitter pill. Iran has failed to play the game by the standards of the ‘peace decorum’ and since the IAEA remains dissatisfied with their nuclear aspirations, the only option is to boycott Iran, impose economic sanctions. The sanctions have been showing their impact and unless the Khomeini government builds alliances in the region, to successfully bypass the international ‘payment’ transactions, there is little hope for them economically.

Pakistan hence becomes a key player, and one that has to make a quick decision. Only two weeks back Hilary Clinton made it clear that joining hands with Iran will only force the United States to blacklist Pakistan as well. And of course, given the fragile state of our economy who wants to be in the bad books of international coercion squad? A vicious cycle once again. The pros versus cons of going ahead with the pipeline project have been contemplated for years now. There is no solution. India had the luxury of backing out. Firstly, after economic steak (to begin with the capital to invest), India’s economic well being to a great degree is dependent of the success of the TAPI pipeline (Tajikistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India). The United States also signed a nuclear contract, a polite way of returning the favor. In Pakistan’s case, the promise of TAPI in the long run, with any compensation remains an unattractive bargain. Also, a general rough patch with the United States since the war on terror has made Pakistan suspicious of the US’ word. It would be accurate to say the United States has been a fair weathered friend.

Regional stability and keeping our options open on the diplomatic grid seem to be smarter options. The United State’s threats have made Pakistan cautious. Two years ago the pipeline, in the imagination of Tehran and Islamabad stood exactly where it stands today. By 2014, we had projected the project to be complete and pumping. And yet as Islamabad chooses to procrastinate, the energy, economic and law and order situations worsen. Tehran shook hands with Islamabad this Monday, 4 February 2013. For the domestic government to actually go forward with this decision would be a bold move, sound to have consequences. Could Balochistan’s security worsen, or perhaps another shootout at the Afghan-Pakistan border, we can only find out. But taking a firm stand today is a far better move than waiting for a miracle from the land of broken promises.


Who speaks for the Baloch of DG Khan?

February 6, 2013

By Aima Khosa
SPEARHEAD RESEARCH

Who speaks for the Baloch of DG KhanAs our government mulls over the questionable fate of the Seraiki province, protests have erupted all over the country with calls for all kinds of provinces – provinces based on ethnicities, provinces based on “administrative grounds”, provinces based on linguistic differences. So while there are calls to permanently damage Pakistan’s already-frayed map, here are two scents on a concern Maula Fazalur Rehman raised at the meeting where the commission came up with recommendations for the new province.

A brief history of Dera Ghazi Khan is in order. The city goes back as far as 1476 when Baloch chieftain Nawab Ghazi Khan Mirani declared independence from the Langah Dynasty of Multan. Along with two other deras(encampments) – Dera Ismail Khan and Dera Fateh Khan – Derajat was born.

Derajat eventually came into the possession of the British rule after the Sikh War of 1849. It was then divided into two districts, Dera Ismail Khan and Dera Ghazi Khan. A little known fact about this division is that the tribal leaders were presented the option of going with Balochistan or Punjab. The Baloch leaders of DG Khan, under an agreement with the British rulers, chose to side with Punjab. While the exact terms of the agreement are not known, the general principles of the agreement were that the tribal leaders would be allowed to continue to uphold their Jirga traditions and largely remain separate from direct government intervention in their affairs. This is, of course, largely conjecture but a layman in DG Khan today would tell you the same story. There is also a widely held view that another agreement was signed at the time of the partition with similar conditions.

Naturally, both these agreements do not stand anymore. However, the Baloch presence in Southern Punjab is still there. The population of DG Khan today roughly comprises of 80 percent Baloch. This is largely due to the proximity of Balochistan to the city – Dera Ghazi Khan is nestled right at the tail of Suleiman Range that opens in Punjab. These are not the Seraiki speaking Baloch, as is the widely-held belief. Instead, Balochi is the commonly spoken language of the area. Another reason for the large number of the Baloch in the city is the presence of the Baloch tribal families and their landholdings surrounding the region.

So, if this new province is being created along ethnic lines, it is surprising that no one has taken into account the presence of the Baloch in the new Seraiki province. Who is going to speak for them? There has been no survey conducted to see if the people of Southern Punjab actually want the new province, let alone a referendum, giving a choice to the Baloch of the province to side with Balochistan if they so wanted.

Naturally, one would ask why DG Khan would want to go over to Balochistan. That province, after all, is in deep turmoil itself. There is little economic growth and development, poor law and order situation and a generally volatile ethnic balance.

It is precisely for this very reason that DG Khan going under the provincial control of Balochistan might just end up benefitting Balochistan andDG Khan.

While Balochistan is the largest province of Pakistan in terms of area, it is also the poorest. Balochistan has the lowest literacy rate among all of Pakistan’s provinces. According to National Economic Survey, the province also has the least number of educational institutions, the lowest literacy rate among both males and females, the lowest ranking in the Gender Parity Index (GPI) and the smallest presence of private educational institutes in the country. Furthermore, about six percent of the schools in Balochistan do not have buildings, nine percent lack electricity, 12 percent are devoid of clean drinking water and 11 percent are without proper latrine.

So now imagine a city, a relatively poor city of Punjab, entering Balochistan’s sphere. This city has a literacy rate of 60 percent – quite a feat for such a small, poor district. There are at least 15 different institutes in the city. There is a medical school, a college of agriculture, several law institutes, colleges of commerce and colleges of education. Furthermore, there are a number of public and private sector primary education institutes functioning in the area.

Similarly, the economy in Dera Ghazi Khan is relatively rich for such a small city. It is located in rich agricultural land with cotton, wheat, sugarcane, rice, tobacco being the major crops being grown. The city is also famous for its dates. Furthermore, the city has access to other parts of the country via railway, including Multan, Lahore, Karachi and Quetta.

One cannot, as well, forget the all-important DG Khan Cement Company Limited, Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, the Al-Ghazi Tractors and Rahim Bux Textile Mills. A commonly held, if also commonly forgotten, belief is that these companies along with several other flour, cotton, chemical and rice mills in the area form the backbone of Punjab.

Balochistan, as a province, could do well with a city that boasts of educational and economic development. And DG Khan, similarly, could do well with Balochistan as its vital city, bustling with economic growth and educational strength (yes, I am hinting as DG Khan being the capital city of Balochistan). One must not forget that Balochistan also has a vast supply of natural gas, coal and other minerals. Other untapped aspects of Balochistan’s economy are fisheries, mining, manufacturing industries and trade. With a close proximity to Punjab via DG Khan, and with the benefits of DG Khan pouring in to Balochistan, the Baloch on either side of the Suleiman Range could do well together.

DG Khan also has a relatively balanced ethnic ratio. It is a safer and more stable city. Balochistan, as a province, needs a city like that under its sphere. And DG Khan, as a city, needs a stronger recognition and a presence in a province that would actually benefit from it.

So while our leaders mull and debate and while our intellectuals tweet and argue, the question remains, who will speak for the Baloch of DG Khan? What is their place in the new Seraiki province, when they, after all, not Seraiki?


Bush had blueprint to seize Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal in 2007

May 20, 2011

The man who devised the Bush administration’s Iraq troop surge has urged the US to consider sending elite troops to Pakistan to seize its nuclear weapons if the country descends into chaos.

In a series of scenarios drawn up for Pakistan, Frederick Kagan, a former West Point military historian, has called for the White House to consider various options for an unstable Pakistan.

These include: sending elite British or US troops to secure nuclear weapons capable of being transported out of the country and take them to a secret storage depot in New Mexico or a “remote redoubt” inside Pakistan; sending US troops to Pakistan’s north-western border to fight the Taliban and al-Qaida; and a US military occupation of the capital Islamabad, and the provinces of Punjab, Sindh and Baluchistan if asked for assistance by a fractured Pakistan military, so that the US could shore up President Pervez Musharraf and General Ashfaq Kayani, who became army chief this week.

“These are scenarios and solutions. They are designed to test our preparedness. The United States simply could not stand by as a nuclear-armed Pakistan descended into the abyss,” Kagan, who is with the American Enterprise Institute, a thinktank with strong ideological ties to the Bush administration, told the Guardian. “We need to think now about our options in Pakistan,”

Kagan argued that the rise of Sunni extremism in Pakistan, coupled with the proliferation of al-Qaida bases in the north-west, posed a real possibility of terrorists staging a coup that would give them access to a nuclear device. He also noted how sections of Pakistan’s military and intelligence establishment continued to be linked to Islamists and warned that the army, demoralised by having to fight in Waziristan and parts of North-West Frontier Province, might retreat from the borders, leaving a vacuum that would be filled by radicals. Worse, the military might split, with a radical faction trying to take over Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

Kagan accepted that the Pakistani military was not in the grip of Islamists. “Pakistan’s officer corps and ruling elites remain largely moderate. But then again, Americans felt similarly about the shah’s regime and look what happened in 1979,” he said, referring to Iran.

The scenarios received a public airing two weeks ago in an article for the New York Times by Kagan and Michael O’Hanlon, an analyst at the Brookings Institution, who has ties to the Democrats.

They have been criticised in the US as well as Pakistan, with Kagan accused of drawing up plans for another US occupation of a Muslim country.

But the scenarios are regarded with some seriousness because of Kagan’s influence over thinking in the Bush administration as the architect of the Iraq troop surge, which is conceded to have brought some improvements in security.

A former senior state department official who works as a contractor with the government and is familiar with current planning on Pakistan told the Guardian: “Governments are supposed to think the unthinkable. But these ideas, coming as they do from a man of significant influence in Washington’s militarist camp, seem prescriptive and have got tongues wagging – even in a town like Washington, built on hyperbole.”

Kagan said he was not calling for an occupation of Pakistan.

“I have been arguing the opposite. We cannot invade, only work with the consent of elements of the Pakistan military,” he said.

“But we do have to calculate how to quantify and then respond to a crisis that is potentially as much a threat as Soviet tanks once were. Pakistan may be the next big test.”

The political and security crises there have led the Bush administration to conclude that Pakistan has become a more dangerous place than it was before Musharraf took over in the coup of October 1999.

One Pentagon official said last week that the defence department had indeed been war-gaming some of Kagan’s scenarios.

A report by Kagan and O’Hanlon in April highlighted their argument.

“The only serious response to this international environment is to develop armed forces capable of protecting America’s vital interests throughout this dangerous time,” it said.

But in Pakistan, aides to Musharraf yesterday dismissed Kagan’s study as “hyperbole”.


PML-Q supports division of Punjab province

April 29, 2011

Geo News

LAHORE: Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) in an indication to join the PPP-led coalition government in the centre, has supported creation of new provinces in the Punjab including Hazara province but opposed division of Sindh, Geo News reported on Thursday.

Talking media, PML-Q leader Chaudhry Pervaz Elahi said they had consulted around 300 politicians and party leaders about joining of the coalition government, adding that party office-bearers from all the four provinces have granted authority to them about any decision regarding it.

Chaudhry said they were joining PPP coalition in the interest of the nation and the country. PML-Q was not greedy of ministries, he said and added that to redress the problems of masses was important for them.

He further said MQM and JUI-F were also being consulted on this issue.

Referring to division of provinces, Pervaz Elahi elaborated that creation of Hazara and new provinces in South Punjab were in the agenda of PML-Q for joining the coalition government. He said his party opposed division of Sindh.


HO HUM

April 5, 2011

By: Salman Azeem
ZoneAsia-Pk

The dictionary explains ‘ho hum’ as being an ‘expression of tediousness or boredom’. Ho Hum, therefore, best describes the state of minds in Pakistan. There was a time several months ago when the media, political aspirants and others created the hype of an imminent change of government. Media debates and writings ranged over various possibilities. Politicians in the opposition ran around trying to forge alliances and hurl derogatory epithets at others. An activist judiciary was seen as the torch bearer of change and the ‘establishment’ was seen as being in support of the judiciary and the secret behind the scenes manipulator. Each new event whether on the streets of Karachi or Baluchistan or in FATA or Punjab was seen as another nail in the governments’ coffin. Lurid details of corruption, mismanagement and cronyism were being shouted from rooftops.

This is no longer the case now. The politicians in the opposition are running around like headless chickens – outwitted and out maneuvered. The media continues its diatribes but these are accepted and no longer make waves or even ripples – they are seen for what they are, ploys for revenue generation from advertisements. The judiciary is independent and going about its business with some cracks visible – no one expects miracles. The establishment has been accepted as having broken from the past and is seen as a bystander with its work cut out. Scams and scandals surface and disappear into investigations and court procedures. Lawlessness is being accepted as kidnappings, murders, random killings, bombings and street rage become a fact of life – not even making headlines any more. Bizarre incidents like the Davis killings and the Taseer-Bhatti murders provoke rage that peters out into despair. The government continues to function and the country gets run somehow. Economic decline, rising prices, increasing poverty and joblessness are topics for discussion because there is nothing else to discuss. Life goes on and the name of the game is acceptance and compromise. No one is excited anymore – not even by the 2013 elections.

No longer is the nation waiting for a savior to come galloping on a white horse. No one is expecting the strategic ally – the US or the much touted Friends of Pakistan to work a miracle in Pakistan. If anything the suspicion about US intentions has reached a crescendo. Reality has kicked in. The reality is that this elected government is going to complete its tenure – its accomplishments are being slowly seen from between all its warts. Political shenanigans are exposing people as never before. No one has so far said anything profound, strategic or visionary – the future looks dreary. There is grudging acceptance of the fact that the country has weathered difficult situations – some of Tsunami strength and held its own. Dire predictions continue to be made but they lack conviction and those making them lack credibility. The ‘establishments’ hands-off policy is being accepted as reality and even the pronouncements by the US fail to create a dent. This is a classic case of a game having been played to the finish leaving everyone exhausted – no one is crying foul and if someone is then there is no listener.

The time has come to move on. The media needs to revamp with meaty futuristic debates. The political scene needs new faces below thinking brains. The US needs to rethink strategy to change its image in public opinion. The ‘establishment’, the bureaucracy and the judiciary need to deliver – to the people. Those in power need to see the snowball that might roll on despair turned into rage to gain size, momentum and power before.


The face behind right-wing terror

March 15, 2011

The mastermind, the real face of right-wing terror has now been unmasked. As per exclusive inputs available with Zee News, a person named Alok Kumar is believed to have led the teams that carried out the blasts at Ajmer Sharif, Mecca Masjid, and Samjhauta Express.

An investigation by Zee News found that Alok Kumar led the group of alleged right-wing extremists, including Sadhvi Pragya, Swami Aseemanand and Sunil Joshi (now dead) which carried out blasts across the country.

He is believed to have first met Aseemanand in 2005 in Dang district of Gujarat, where they hatched the plot.

Kumar went on to become the ‘northern commander’ of the group in no time. He was in-charge of covert operations in the states of Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Punjab, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh.

Alok Kumar is also believed to have recruited and personally trained sympathisers in Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Delhi. In fact, Mecca Masjid blast accused Colonel Purohit is suspected to have attended a training camp at Madhya Pradesh’s Panchmari.

The group is believed to have received foreign funding from one of Alok’s aide in Nepal, while the local funding was arranged by Assemanand’s network.


India’s abandoned wives rue broken promises

December 23, 2010

A velvet-bound album of wedding photographs and two unused train tickets for her honeymoon are the only remnants of Amanjyot Kaur’s marriage.

One week after the grand wedding ceremony in a small village in the Indian state of Punjab, Kaur’s husband, who lives in Montreal, Canada, returned home, promising to send his new wife documents she needed for a visa.

But the papers never arrived and when Kaur finally managed to get in touch with her husband he refused to recognise her.

“I wrote 120 letters, made nearly 500 phone calls to reach him in Canada but nothing moved him,” said 22-year-old Kaur, who has suffered chronic depression since her wedding two years ago.

“I hate myself for loving an insensitive man. He cheated me, and my family,” she said, gesturing to her father who had to sell four acres of farmland to meet the lavish wedding expenses.

Kaur is just one of thousands of brides abandoned in India by expatriate Indians who return to the country for arranged marriages and then flee — taking the dowry money with them.

According to the Lok Bhalai party, a small political organisation in Punjab, over 22,000 abandoned brides have registered criminal cases against their NRI (Non-Resident Indian) grooms.

The party’s founder, B. Ramoowalia, calculated that in the last 10 years he has helped 1,200 deserted brides trace their husbands.

“Marriage is the easiest way to make money for these men. They plan their exit from the country as soon as they get the dowry,” he said.

“The real number is unknown because many women from conservative backgrounds worry that complaining could bring shame on their families.”

In India, paying and accepting a dowry has been illegal since 1961, but the centuries-old tradition of the bride’s parents presenting gifts of cash, clothes and jewellery to the groom’s family remains strong across society.

Kaur declines to reveal how much dowry her husband collected, but the figure is often thousands of dollars.

The Indian wedding season is in full swing, with young Indian men who live in Canada, Britain and other Western countries travelling to their ancestral villages to find a bride as their parents insist on traditional daughters-in-law.

Young girls are often desperate to emigrate to escape mundane village life and aspire to settle overseas — but many unions last just days.

“I always dreamt of living in a foreign country ,” said Kaur, who remains in the village of Bilga, where she mourns the happy life she believes she has been denied.

“Every woman wants a good husband and a happy family but I don’t think I will ever have one.”

Dubbed as “holiday brides”, the women are unable to marry again, feel guilty for being a burden on their parents, and often hold onto the distant hope that their husbands will change their minds and rescue them.

“But this never happens. The grooms never come back to the village, fearing that they would be arrested or beaten up by the villagers,” said Radha Navin, a bride abandoned by an English-Indian man in 2004.

She now runs a tailoring business staffed by abandoned women in Punjab’s capital city, Chandigarh.

“Go to any village in Punjab and you will find at least one ‘holiday bride’ living with her parents or forced to depend on relatives for financial handouts,” she said. “The government needs to recognise this massive social problem.”

Navin tells how, just days after her wedding, her husband said he had a European girlfriend and that he would only help with her visa if Navin agreed to live with the “other woman” in the same house in Southall in London.

“I refused his offer and filed a police complaint but he managed to escape by bribing some of the police officers,” she said.

Other stories recount how the groom leaves India and then demands more and more cash from the bride’s family, saying that unless the money is paid he will never collect her.

A 2007 report by the Punjab University stated that about 25,000 abandoned women in Punjab alone faced an uphill battle against a legal system which provides little hope of justice.

It suggested the Indian government should stamp the marital status of NRIs in their passports and bring in new laws to protect vulnerable women.

But Navin said there was a reluctance for politicians in Punjab to tackle the issue as many of the expatriate grooms involved come from families who provide parties with donations.

“Why would a political party want to upset their donors. For some NRIs marriages are not made in heaven but on the basis of money,” she said.


SC summons chief secretary to explain police failure

November 2, 2010

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court summoned the chief secretary Punjab for today (Tuesday) to explain as to why the police were so helpless in providing protection to the people.

The court admonished the home secretary and the IG Prisons, Punjab, after additional advocate general Punjab informed it that the police had failed to make a headway in the recovery of 11 prisoners involved in heinous crimes and allegedly abducted by intelligence agencies from the Adiala Jail.

A three-member bench of the apex court, comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Ghulam Rabbani and Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday, was hearing a case of alleged abduction of 11 prisoners, involved in heinous crimes, from the Adiala Jail by intelligence agencies.

Home Secretary, Punjab, Shahid Khan, IG Prisons, Punjab, Kokab Nadeem Warraich, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, Khadim Hussain Qaiser, CPO Rawalpindi Fakhar Sultan, DCO Rawalpindi Imdad Ullah Bosal and Deputy Attorney General K K Agha appeared before the court.

During the course of hearing, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, Khadim Hussain Qaiser, informed the court that the police had so far failed to recover the prisoners, allegedly handed over to intelligence agencies by the police from the Adiala Jail, Rawalpindi.

The court asked the additional advocate general to read out the judgment passed by the Lahore High Court, ordering the release of prisoners, but who were allegedly abducted by intelligence agencies from the Adiala Jail.

Home Secretary, Punjab, Shahid Khan, told the court that he was appointed in September, therefore, he was not quite aware of the whole matter, adding that the then secretary home could be well aware of the issue.

“You are equally responsible for this and you will have to bring the missing people,” the CJP asked the home secretary, adding, “If you were an aggrieved party, then you should have challenged the LHC judgment.”

“If you are trying to say that DCO, CPO and former home secretary were responsible for the matter, they all will have to go behind the bars,” Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday said to the home secretary.

The chief justice asked from the home secretary when all officials, including DCO, CPO etc, knew, why being a responsible official, he could have remained ignorant about the issue. “Let the law take its course, when the law takes its course, everything will be ok,” the CJP remarked.

The chief justice further asked the home secretary that if they were helpless, they should tell the court so that the court could summon other concerned people. “What are your plans now to deal with the matter?” the CJP asked the home secretary.

Shahid Khan, however, sought more time for the police to investigate the matter and produce results. He further told the court that Interior Ministry should also be given the task to deal with the matter.

“The only agency we have was the police to deal with the issue,” Shahid Khan told the court. “Your chief secretary should appear before the court and tell us that they are helpless in giving protection to the people,” Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday told the home secretary.

“Why are the police not fulfilling their professional obligations?” the CJP remarked. Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday asked Deputy Attorney General K K Agha that if this was the performance of the police in such a high profile case, how the common people could be given relief.

IG Prisons, Punjab, Kokab Nadeem Warraich, told the court that at the time of the incident of handing over the prisoners to intelligence agencies, Superintendent, Adiala Jail Saeedullah Gondal was on leave. At this, the court asked for relevant details of his leave, which he failed to produce before the court.

Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday admonished Warraich for failing to produce the relevant record of the superintendent’s leave. “Why are you producing fake record before the court?” he further asked.

The IG prisons, however, told the court that due to security reasons and fear of threats of the Taliban, the police could not give exact information about them. He further told the court that the Superintendent Adiala Jail Saeedullah Gondal informed him on phone that he was on leave.

Deputy Attorney General K K Agha told the court that as per allegations, the prisoners were handed over to secret agencies. He contacted all the intelligence agencies and was told that these individuals were not in their custody.

The court adjourned the hearing till today (Tuesday) after summoning the chief secretary Punjab. On the last hearing, the court had directed Rawalpindi City Police Officer Fakhar Sultan to file service record of Adiala Jail Superintendent Saeedullah Gondal after the counsel for the petitioners (abductees) had told the court that the Adiala Jail superintendent handed over 11 persons to intelligence agencies and they were in police custody for the last three years.

The prisoners, who were allegedly abducted by the intelligence agencies from the Adiala jail after the Lahore High Court (LHC) had ordered their release were: Dr Niaz Ahmed, Mazharul Haq, Shafiqur Rehman, Muhammad Aamir, Abdul Majid, Abdul Basit, Abdul Saboor, Shafique Ahmed, Said Arab, Gul Roze and Tehseenullah.

These prisoners were acquitted by an anti-terrorism court in April this year in four different cases, including firing rocket on Pakistan Aeronautical Complex, Kamra, firing rockets on the plane of former president Pervez Musharraf, suicide attack on the bus of personnel of an intelligence agency in Rawalpindi and the suicide attack on the main entrance of military headquarters.

Even after acquittal, these prisoners were detained in the jail by the Punjab home department. Later the LHC set aside their detention orders, asking for their immediate release. But instead of release, they were allegedly abducted by intelligence agencies. After their alleged abduction, the LHC ordered registration of criminal case against the jail chief.

The Adiala Jail authorities had maintained before the LHC that they had properly released the men after getting their written signatures and fulfilling all requirements. Adiala Jail Superintendent Saeedullah Gondal had said he was on leave on the day the men were released and he had nothing to do with their alleged disappearance. However, the LHC had ordered registration of a case against Saeedullah Gondal and Deputy Superintendent Khalid Bashir.

Area Magistrate for Saddar Bairuni police Muhammad Ashraf Gondal remanded the two jail officials Superintendent Saeedullah Gondal and his deputy Khalid Bashir to police custody after the police sought their custody to interrogate them over the alleged abduction of 11 men from the jail after their acquittal in terrorism cases. Saddar Bairuni police SHO Malik Tahir had confirmed that five days custody of two officials had been obtained after they were arrested from outside the Supreme Court in connection with the abduction case registered against them on the orders of the LHC.


India’s Water Nightmare

September 16, 2010

Millions of Indians can’t access fresh water on a daily basis, Shreyasi Singh reports. And the situation is set to get worse.

By Shreyasi Singh

Pinky Devi begins her long day in the chaotic urban sprawl that is Garhi, New Delhi, at the crack of dawn. She has to, otherwise she risks missing out on the seven minutes of municipal water supply that will splutter through the two taps in her tiny one room home.

‘My day is a collection drive,’ laughs the 32-year-old mother of three as she explains the different water sources she has to resort to each day. At 8 o’clock every morning, she queues up to fill colourful plastic buckets from the water tanker that chugs through her neighbourhood each day. The area’s residents have to pool money to buy tanker water to supplement their meagre supply.

‘About 15 percent of our household budget goes to water. How did water become a luxury?’ Pinky asks.

That she has to ask the question this year is something of an irony considering that Delhi received an unusually large rainfall last month of about 450 mm. The Yamuna River, normally a shallow trickle, exceeded danger levels on several days in August, while torrential downpours played havoc with traffic in the city. Many roads were water-logged, leaving commuters stuck for hours in jams.

Yet Pinky’s district in Delhi is far from alone. Analysts say India’s per capita water availability is set to slip below the critical 1,000 cubic metres mark by 2025, and the country is expected to join China in facing significant water stress.

The turnaround in India’s water situation has been dramatic. In 2005, the Global Water Initiative said India had ‘abundant’ water in 1975 but that by 2000, this happy state of affairs had turned into ‘stress’ even as demand has continued to grow.

‘Water-The India Story’, a widely quoted study by market research firm Grail Research, points out that India’s per capita domestic consumption of water is expected to grow to 167 litres a day by 2050, up from 88.9 in 2000. Factor in the growing population (expected to increase from 1.13 billion in 2005 to 1.66 billion by 2050) and the picture starts to look bleak.

One recent report, by Ravi Narayanan, vice chair of the Asia Pacific Water Forum, stated that even conservative estimates suggest that over 40 million people still need to be provided with safe water and about 100 million people with adequate sanitation just to reach Millennium Development Goals for urban India, much less reach universal coverage.

Such forecasts should be sounding alarm bells among policymakers.

In May this year, the vast central state of Madhya Pradesh (MP) saw violent clashes over water that led to five deaths. Such incidents have become common in MP, where official estimates (likely to prove optimistic), suggest about 70 percent of the state’s 65 million people don’t have adequate access to water.

Indeed, one recent newspaper report said as many as 175 towns in the state have water supply only once every 2 or more days, while another 20 make do with water once every 5 days. Even in its leafy, green capital of Bhopal (ironically known as the city of lakes), there’s an increasing struggle to access water, with police being called in to some districts to ensure water distribution remains orderly.

Water issues are also driving politics. The southern states of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka have been locked for decades in a battle over sharing the water of the 800-kilometre Cauvery River. The riparian states, one on the river’s upstream and the other on the downstream, continue to clash over the quantity of water that’s being distributed from the river.

Rohini Nilekani, Chairperson of Arghyam, a water conservation not-for-profit, says the lack of thorough analysis of the issue has fuelled many of the problems now being encountered across the country. As a funding agency, Arghyam focuses on quantity, quality and access to domestic water. ‘Water is one of the key resources of all economic activity,’ Nilekani says.

‘But have we really tried to understand it? How much do we take it into account before planning our economic strategy?’

At present, agriculture guzzles nearly 90 percent of India’s water consumption, even though it contributes only about 17 percent of the country’s GDP. This imbalance is, suggests Grail Research’s report, set to grow, with production of water-intensive crops expected to jump by 80 percent between 2000 and 2050, while the volume of water used for irrigation in India is likely to increase by 68.5 trillion litres between 2000 and 2025.

D.R. Sikka, former director of the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, says tough policy decisions need to be taken to ease agriculture’s dangerously insatiable appetite for water. Overall, India isn’t a naturally water-rich country, he explains, noting that it has several dry areas and only two main sources of fresh water-glacier melt, which is restricted to the months of April to June, and the three-month-long monsoon season that runs until September.

‘So 90 percent of our rainwater is available for only 3 to 4 months a year. If the monsoon fails, an entire season is lost,’ Sikka says. ‘But governments haven’t taken a long term view of our water policy. Over the last many decades, political systems have given farmers free electricity. This has enabled them to use electrical pumps at will to extract groundwater.’

India is generally seen as under-legislating its groundwater, with almost anybody being able to extract water with little or no permission. As things stand, the population density supported by India’s river basins is higher than most other developing countries. Yet Grail’s findings suggest that by 2050, groundwater levels in the Ganges basin will be depleted by between 50 and 70 percent; levels in the Krishna, Kaveri and Godavari basins, which provide water to the big southern states, could be depleted by as much as half.

‘Farmers have also been encouraged to produce bumper, water-intensive crops like rice, even in states like Punjab, Haryana and Western UP which aren’t really water-rich,’ adds Sikka, a member of several committees on climate change at the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Indian Space Research Organisation and Indian Meteorological Department. ‘Scientists can only express the dangers we see imminent. Keen political will is required for big changes. (But) the farmer lobby is so strong ‘.

Providing Indians with adequate water faces other challenges, too. Analysts say water regulation suffers from India’s notorious hydra-headed government mechanisms that make a clear course difficult to arrive at, while inadequate revenue flows from providing water are another concern-although tariffs and policies differ across states, in most, water is either highly subsidised or virtually free.

But issues like pricing are both complex and sensitive. ‘It’s a very politically polarising question-how do you price water?’ says Nilekani.’Living people and the environment need water to survive. That can’t be disputed. But water has a financial cost because investments are made to transport it, treat it.’

‘We need to figure out a sustainable financial and social model. Many approaches need to be evaluated, to be explored.’

But she believes that as is so often the case in India, necessity is the mother of invention. ‘That’s begun to happen in India,’ she says. ‘Over the past five years I’ve worked in this sector, I’ve seen water move to the centre of dialogue.’

For industry, at least, simple economics is necessitating fledgling conservation and renewal programmes. ‘The larger companies in sectors like paper, chemicals and refineries have realised they need to limit water consumption,’ says K.S. Venkatagiri, Principal Counsellor at the CII-Godrej Green Business Centre in Hyderabad.

The GBC, set up by India’s apex business body, the Confederation of Indian Industry, offers companies advisory services on a range of environmental issues such as energy efficiency, water management and renewable energy.

‘Many European buyers have begun asking companies to state their carbon and water footprint, and to show reductions on that year on year,’ Venkatagiri says. Some companies, like ITC and Mahindra & Mahindra, have led by example, with ITC actually having already become ‘water positive’ (it replenishes more water than it uses) thanks to its determined water management efforts.

Since it was established in 2004, the CII-GBC has conducted 40 water audits and now helps save 8 billion cubic metres of water annually. Meanwhile, 413 large and medium-sized companies have become signatories of the CII Code for Ecologically Sustainable Business Growth requiring them to reduce specific consumption of energy and water by 2 to 6 percent every year over the next 10 years.

But Venkatagiri admits that although industry is only expected to account for just under one-fifth of annual water consumption by 2050, much more still needs to be done.

‘It’s not going to be top priority, not like drinking water or agriculture,’ he says, but adds that industry must still play a leadership role by working with local communities beyond their own premises and profitability to create awareness on the three R’s-reduce, recycle, replenish.

Indeed, analysts say local community participation is crucial because large engineering projects and ambitious ideas like the interlinking of rivers could actually lead to more disruptions if not carried out properly.

The rush to ‘tame’ river waters using ‘hard’ investments over ‘soft’ alternatives needs to be carefully monitored, says Sikka. ‘The increase in the number of floods isn’t because of excessive rainfall. Water released from dams has caused many of them.’

Nilekani, meanwhile, believes that a decentralised approach will be vital. ‘If we don’t take (water) monitoring and administration to the third level of governance, it won’t work,’ Nilekani says. ‘Local bodies need to have some authority over the usage of water…We just can’t create water infrastructure that’s so capital and maintenance heavy that we can’t afford it.’


UK outlines relief plan for Sindh, Punjab

September 9, 2010

Maha Mussadaq

ISLAMABAD: International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell has announced to immediately address the health and sanitation needs of flood-stricken provinces of Punjab and Sindh this week.


The UK government plans to bring in more relief goods and essential needs for the flood-hit areas.

The UK government has decided to strengthen their support towards development projects and provide urgently needed assistance in both the provinces. The UK government plans to bring in more relief goods and essential needs for the flood-hit areas.

The latest contribution of the new supplies and the flights coming in is summed up to £2.5 million out of the £64 million already committed by the UK Government in response to the flood crisis in Pakistan. However the supplies will be distributed by Save the Children, IOM, Unicef, and other relief agencies.

Approximately 2,155 hygiene kits per day and 5,300 water containers will be produced per day for 14 days in factories in Lahore and Karachi and will be distributed across Sindh and Punjab. The UK government in collaboration with the International Humanitarian Partnership (IHP) which consists of members from Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Estonia, and Finland will also set up emergency field operations and set up base camps for 72 relief workers from the UN and NGOs in Sukkur.

There are three more flights being chartered to Pakistan from Nairobi, Beijing, and the East Midlands that will fly in essential needs such as water tanks, 34 million water purification tablets making 340 million litres of safe drinking water; 3,016 shelter kits providing protection from the elements for more than 3,000 families; 12,525 blankets and 4,510 sets of basic cooking utensils. Recently, Five Royal Air Force and four chartered flights have already brought in shelter kits for 12,000 families along with 3,500 tents, 50,000 blankets, 1.7m water purification tablets and 24,000 water containers.

“The floods in Pakistan are extraordinary and demand an extraordinary response. That’s why we are taking these inventive approaches to set up an emergency production line and scouring the globe to fly in such huge quantities of urgently needed items,” said Mitchell addressing the UK House of Commons. “Some parts of southern Pakistan are still under four feet of water, which won’t drain away for some time due to heavy clay in the soil. Unless people can access safe water and sanitation there is a real threat of a public health disaster from waterborne diseases,” added Mitchell.


Saudi Flood Aid To Pakistan: First, Largest, Not Politicized

August 30, 2010


Saudi Arabia was the first nation to respond to Pakistan’s flood aid appeal. It created a back-to-back air bridge that saw 30 cargo planes land in Pakistan.

Washington’s aid is politicized and arrogant; Riyadh’s aid is compassionate

By GULPARI NAZISH MEHSUD
Monday, 30 August 2010.
WWW.PAKNATIONALISTS.COM

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan-Saudi Arabia has quietly bypassed the United States as the single largest aid donor in real terms so far. Riyadh’s commitment to helping the victims of Pakistan’s devastating floods has crossed US$140 million.

The Saudis have also outdone themselves. The Saudi military and air force set up a back-to-back air bridge between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, sending thirty large cargo planes carrying hundreds of tons of relief goods. The air bridge continues to operate.

With more than $120 million sent in cash, the first 3-day international telethon to raise funds, and 30 major air relief shipments to land in Pakistan in what is the largest air bridge in support of flood victims, Saudi response was better than any other nation.

The only exceptions are UAE sending six helicopters when the United States initially provided only five, [later increased to 15]. After its initial reluctance, US surpassed any other donor by providing three large cargo planes in addition to ten more helicopters. Most of the pledged US aid money is, however, ‘recycled’ from earlier aid commitments to Pakistan and is not new. And, according to Ahmed Quraishi, Project Pakistan Senior Fellow at Project For Pakistan In 21st Century, an independent Islamabad-based think tank, US help is politicized, meant to shore up a pro-US govt. in Islamabad in the face of better performances by the Pakistani military and Pakistani charities in responding to the humanitarian disaster.

Mr. Quraishi told PakNationalists.com: “Despite frosty relations with the Zardari-Gilani government, Riyadh’s aid was massive but received little media attention in Pakistan. Unlike the US embassy’s clamor for publicity and attention, the Saudis and others worked quietly. At one point, the Saudi ambassador is reported to have told Pakistani reporters that the Pakistani media failed to highlight the fact that Riyadh was the first country to respond to Pakistani help request after the floods.”

SAUDI REACTION

Within the first week of the flooding that started on 29 July, Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz ordered a massive kingdom-wide fundraising and aid collection campaign. Official aid collection camps were set up in all major Saudi cities. The Saudi royal family set an example when several princes donated $20 million on the first day, encouraging Saudi citizens to follow suit. More than $107 million were collected in the first three days.

Saudi Arabia established the largest air bridge to air lift relief supplies to Pakistan, sending more than 30 cargo planes so far to Sindh, Balochistan, Khyber-PK and Punjab. Saudi Arabia is the only country so far to have established such a large back-to-back air bridge to Pakistan.


The Saudi rescue team busy in Thatta.

Eight more planes have landed in Pakistan over the weekend carrying two field hospitals, complete with equipment and medical staff. The Saudi ambassador Abdul Aziz bin Ibrahim al-Ghadeer hardly visited his office in Islamabad in the past two weeks because of his constant field presence in Lahore, Multan, and Hyderabad, in addition to the Chaklala Air Force base in Rawalpindi, to receive Saudi cargo planes. On the recommendation of the Pakistani military, which suggested the hospitals focus on Sindh, one Saudi field hospital has already become operational in Thatta. The second field hospital will also probably be set up somewhere in Sindh considering the urgency there.

Two Saudi rescue teams, which Saudi Arabia has raised according to international levels of training and performance following repeated floods in some Saudi regions, have also arrived in Hyderabad where they are active in several parts of the Sindh province.

In neighboring Kuwait, the Kuwaiti government lifted a long standing ban on collecting donations in public. This exception was made on the orders of the Kuwaiti emir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmed in deference to the emerging humanitarian disaster in Pakistan. Donation camps sprung up in large and small mosques and shopping malls across the emirate. Interestingly, the wealthy Kuwaiti business community outshone the government in donating to flood victims in Pakistan. One Kuwaiti logistics company, Agility, mobilized 1,000 of its workers for flood relief effort in Pakistan.

Fundraising efforts outside of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are important but were modest in their outcomes. A German telethon attended by German Chancellor Angela Merkel raised $10 million. British donations came largely from the British Pakistani and British Muslim communities, with the British magazine The Economist showing skepticism at reports suggesting ordinary British citizens have shown any passion to donate to Pakistan. Turkey has donated $10 million, China a little more, while India came up with a symbolic $5 million, probably because smug Indian officials were sure Pakistan won’t accept the money anyway [Pakistan thanked India and accepted the money but asked New Delhi to send through UN]. Iran has sent relief supplies and most other countries have also gave preference to relief goods because of lack of trust in the Pakistani government and politicians’ credibility or ability to utilize aid money properly.

SAUDI ARABIA

One of the most endearing aspects of donations coming to Pakistan from the Gulf is individual donations from politicians and businessmen, which are enough to put the wealthy Pakistani politicians to shame.

On the first day of a nationwide Saudi campaign to raise funds for the victims of floods in Pakistan on Monday, 17 Aug. 2010:

  • King of Saudi Arabia, Abdullah bin Abdelaziz Al Saud, donated US$5.3 million from his private money to Pakistan flood victims
  • Crown Prince Sultan bin Abdelzziz Al Saud gave away US$2.7 million from his private money
  • Interior Minister Nayef bin Abdelaziz Al Saud gave away two million Saudi riyals
  • Governor of Tabouk donated one million Saudi Riyals
  • Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdelaziz Al Saud gave ten million Saudi riyals
  • Businessman Eesa bin Mohammad al Eesa, president of the Samba Financial Group, donated two million Saudi riyals

Separately, and in addition to his $2.7 million in aid, the Saudi Crown Prince has also dispatched one hundred tons of dates from his private farmland to Pakistan.


Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud

The Saudi public’s response to the massive Saudi aid appeal has been amazing. Women were seen donating jewellery to makeshift fundraising camps in Jeddah and Riyadh.

A Saudi commentator left this comment on the website of the Arabic-language Saudi newspaper, Okaz: “What the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, may Allah protect him, has given to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is something that all the five permanent nations at UNSC and all the Arab countries could not have given. His Majesty’s stand with Pakistan will never be forgotten.”

Comments posted at the online editions of Saudi newspapers showed how deeply the Saudis are moved by the tragedy in Pakistan. “Pakistanis deserve our help,” wrote one Saudi. “They are our brothers.”

IRAN

Iran has committed over 400 tons of relief goods so far as of 14 August 2010 out of which 180 tons have already been delivered by the Iranian transport aircrafts. These goods include tents, floorings, clothes, canned food, bread and medical supplies. Iranian Red Crescent society has also been on the ground along with Pakistan Red Crescent society as part of its ongoing relief operation inside Pakistan reaching out to more than 100,000 flood victims. In addition to the Iranian government help Ayatollah Lotfollah Safi Golpaygani has announced that one third of collected Khums will be donated to Pakistan for humanitarian assistance. Iran’s chamber of commerce also donated US $1 million to the flood victims.


Grand Ayatollah Nasir-Makarem Shirazi

And on 17 August, senior Iranian cleric Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem-Shirazi [left] met the Pakistani ambassador in Tehran and announced donating $50,000 to the victims of flood-stricken Pakistan in response to Pakistan’s call for more relief aid.

‘KUWAIT IS WITH YOU’

On 21 August, Kuwaiti government launched a nationwide fundraiser called ‘Kuwait Is With You’, in a message to Pakistanis devastated by the floods.

Kuwait’s official and private donations have crossed $20 million, half of them coming from the government. But most of the aid won’t reach the Pakistani government. The noisy Kuwaiti media, while expressing solidarity with Pakistan, has also seen several write-ups questioning the credibility of the Pakistani government. Some criticized the Pakistani government for ‘collusion’ with Washington in hounding credible Pakistani charities in the name of fighting so-called terror.

The emirate launched a national fundraiser for Pakistan on 23 August, collecting so far close to $10 million from the public.

Kuwait had banned charity fundraisers for the most part of the decade. But on the 23rd, the government lifted the ban to make way for a nationwide fundraiser for Pakistan, which began grandly at the Grand Mosque of the state, where close to 1,000 worshippers donated generously for Pakistan.

Equally impressive is the contribution from the Kuwaiti business community:

  • Mohammad Hmoud Al-Shaya Company, which owns a series of upscale designer clothing and jewellery outlets across the Gulf, donated $500,000 to Pakistan
  • Kuwait Finance House has dispatched $2 million to Pakistan
  • General Secretariat of Awqaf has donated $1.5 million
  • The Joint Kuwaiti Committee for Relief, a local charity, has donated $1.5 million
  • The sons of the late Abdullah al-Mutawa, a businessman, have donated $100,000 to Pakistan
  • E-Q8 Petrochemicals has donated $100,000
  • The employees of the Bank of Bubiyan started an internal fundraiser for Pakistan


Dala al-Mudaf

Dalal al-Mudaf, a senior officer at the Kuwait Investment Company, with offices in the Gulf, London and New York, has kicked off an internal company fundraiser for Pakistan as of today, Monday 30 August. In a statement, she quoted a saying by the Prophet [PBUH], ‘A Muslim for a Muslim is like a wall, pulling one another’.


Tariq al Sultan

Agility, one of the largest logistics companies in the region with operations in Pakistan, has mobilized its 1,000 workers here to get involved in relief work. According to Tariq al-Sultan [right], Chairman of Agility worldwide, the company has offered its entire commercial warehouses full of foodstuffs and the space along with cooling facilities in Multan for use by United Nations in Punjab. In Peshawar, the company has donated several air-conditioned containers to transport food items to flood victims. And in Sukkur, the company has put its entire fleet of trucks in the service of food and aid distribution effort across Sindh. The company has also distributed urgent food items and medicines to 5,000 families in Sindh, and the employees of Agility worldwide have donated their one-day salary to Pakistan.

In another step of indirect support to Pakistan, one of the young members of the Kuwaiti parliament, Mr. Mohammed Hayef al-Huwaila, held a press conference at the parliament building last week and drew the attention of the Arab public opinion to massive human rights violations in Indian occupied Kashmir. He called on the Kuwaiti government to condemn Indian atrocities.


Wasa, EPD lock horns over arsenic in water

July 8, 2010

By Ali Raza
LAHORE

THE Water and Sanitation Agency (Wasa) and the Environmental Protection Department (EPD), Punjab, have locked horns over the accuracy of the EPD’s report on presence of arsenic in the ground water in the provincial metropolis.

Wasa officials claimed that the water analysis of 392 Wasa tube-wells carried out by the EPD showing arsenic level of 168 tube-wells beyond permissible limit of 50 PPB was not reliable. They said that a recent meeting held under the chairmanship of provincial secretary HUD and PHED, Punjab, on July 03, 2010 in which the EPD officials admitted this fact.

WASA claimed that the reasons for the erratic results are due to malfunctioning of De-Ionizer of EPD and non compliance of standard sampling protocols by the EPD officials. They said it was also pointed out in the meeting that water analysis carried out earlier by the PCRWR also showed high arsenic concentration at 74 tube wells. WASA claimed that EPD’s results were also not reliable because the tests were carried out by kit method.

On the other hand, EPA Director General Dr Shagufta Shahjehan strongly opposed Wasa’s point of view and insisted that the tests conducted by the EPD were reliable because they were carried out according to international specifications and methods.

Answering to a question about fault in De-Ionizer, she said the machine was not out of order and was working accurately. She said cartages of the machine were accurate and fresh when the tests were carried out in January 2010.

“Wasa should start planning to install filters for removing arsenic instead of challenging the accuracy of results,” she said, adding that the department had complete reports about the accuracy of De-Ionizer from the experts of JAICA, the Japanese organisation, which donated the machine to the department.

Wasa officials said that to ascertain actual situation they had sent samples of 453 tube-wells to the University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, for analysis. So far 165 samples have been analysed by the UET and samples of two tube-wells were found beyond permissible limit of 50 ppb. The level of errors in water analysis conducted by the EPD, PCRWR and UET can be gauged from the fact that arsenic level detected at Taxali Gate by the EPD was 250, by PCRWR it was 30 and by UET it was only 0.05. They said similar kind of variations were revealed in the water samples of Ali Park, Qaddafi Colony, Q Block, Gulberg, Nappier Road and Krishan Nagar.

Wasa also admitted that due to interconnection of all Wasa tube-wells with each other, dilution could take place which diminishes the level of arsenic in the system caused by any particular tube-well and the government of Punjab was vigilant about the issue and, if anywhere required, arsenic removal plant would be installed there.

EPD Provincial Secretary Sajjad Saleem Hotiyana said that the department had also started reconfirmation of its tests. When asked why the department was reconfirming its own report, he said the department stood by its previous report and water testing was a continuous process. He said the department was also upgrading its lab and testing facilities for the betterment of the general public.


Franchise Offices Raided As IPL Corruption Row Deepens

April 23, 2010

Pakistan News

Offices of a number of Indian Premier League (IPL) franchises were raided by police, Indian media said on Wednesday, amid the growing IPL corruption saga.

Punjab, Kolkata, Chennai and Rajasthan franchises were reportedly raided by police. It was also reported that India’s Enforcement Directorate (ED) will inquire into the ‘unauthorised transfer’ of foreign funds in the IPL, after registering a case against the cash-rich cricket league.

Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers